It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Superhans
Nope, i quoted you. You specifically said it was my wiki which it is not.
Im obsessed?
You have said it more than I and i really don't care the reason why you spell it that way or whatever deep meaning you think it has.
Truth is that it probably just means people who disagree with you on some topics.
Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
Giving me a 500 error right now.
The NY Times doesn't really strike me as war mongers, their reports are quite decent for a mainstream media mouthpiece.
They should take down Fox news instead lol
Originally posted by scoobyrob
wonder how they knew it was the Syrian army... seems a bit quick to be jumping to conclusions unless I'm missing something here, do they have something to tie them to this incident? or are they just guessing and pointing fingers to further their agenda against the Syrian government....??
Originally posted by Laxpla
reply to post by ATSmediaPRO
That's photo-shopped or they just edited the HTML to make it look hacked.
Link
Twitter has issued the following statement on the DNS record issues with Twimg.com.:
At 20:49 UTC, our DNS registrar experienced an issue in which it appears DNS records for various organizations were modified, including one of Twitter’s domains used for image serving,twimg.com. Viewing of images and photos was sporadically impacted. By 22:29 UTC, the original domain record for twimg.comwas restored. No Twitter user information was affected by this incident.
: Melbourne IT is now providing a statement, which we’ve pasted in below (h/t Matthew Keys)
The credentials of a Melbourne IT reseller (username and password) were used to access a reseller account on Melbourne IT’s systems.
The DNS records of several domain names on that reseller account were changed – including nytimes.com
By Mark Hosenball
WASHINGTON | Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:54pm EDT
(Reuters) - The British government has asked the New York Times to destroy copies of documents leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden related to the operations of the U.S. spy agency and its British partner, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), people familiar with the matter said.
The British request, made to Times executive editor Jill Abramson by a senior official at the British Embassy in Washington D.C., was greeted by Abramson with silence, according to the sources. British officials indicated they intended to follow up on their request later with the Times, but never did, one of the sources said.
"Imagine an attack where I walk in to the office where the telephone records are kept, and I fraudulently rewrite all the numbers associated with The New York Times," says Mike Lloyd chief technical officer at security firm RedSeal Networks. "In the physical world, this attack wouldn't be practical. In the online world, this same attack is much more practical, and quite hard to prevent."
RedSeal Networks is a network security company that provides proactive security intelligence to large organizations. The company's solutions have been adopted by organizations around the world to help them continuously monitor the effectiveness of their IT security infrastructure. This helps them identify protection gaps, create actionable metrics, and reduce operational risk. The company is backed by a number of venture capital firms as well as In-Q-Tel, the IT procurement arm of the U.S. intelligence community.[
In-Q-Tel of Arlington, Virginia, United States is a not-for-profit venture capital firm that invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of keeping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, equipped with the latest in information technology in support of United States intelligence capability.