It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PublicGadfly wrote:
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
LTD, shame on you-
you know that's a masonic propaganda site (disinfo) run by mason King.
For REAL masonic information Google works better, such as:
Mason crimes (245,000 choices)
murder and treason excepted
The admonition in the obligation is to impress upon a candidate that a Brother Mason should feel free to share their innermost thoughts without concern about 'blabbing' or reprisal. To suggest that (a) a Mason would commit a criminal act and then (b) tell another Mason about it in order that (c) it would be concealed is foolish in the extreme. (bro. King's disinfo site)
In some Masonic obligations, there appears a phrase which will cause a law-abiding citizen to pause. While the wording may be slightly different from place to place, the essence of the promise is that a Mason agrees to protect a Brother Master Mason's secrets as his own, murder and treason alone excepted.
One may rightfully ask, then: what about other crimes? Robbery, assault, or other crimes against persons or property surely should not be the subject of 'Masonic protection', should they?
Of course not! And no Mason would believe that they were. Immediately prior to taking that Masonic obligation, the candidate is advised that nothing he is about to promise will in any way interfere with any duty he owes to God, his country, his family/neighbor or himself.
Feel free to spin all this.
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
The admonition in the obligation is to impress upon a candidate that a Brother Mason should feel free to share their innermost thoughts without concern about 'blabbing' or reprisal. To suggest that (a) a Mason would commit a criminal act and then (b) tell another Mason about it in order that (c) it would be concealed is foolish in the extreme. bro. King's info site
Riiiiiight.
So, if this oath has no consequence and is in itself deceitful why isn't it either done away with or changed?
Is this same kind of "spin" used on the oath about having sex with another mason's wife?
If so, then to follow Wr. Br. King's logic it would be O.K. just so long as I told about it later? If so, who do I tell first? Do I tell the wife I'm going to tell- if so how long after (sure wouldn't tell her before)?
While we are at it- what did YOU ever come up with regarding it being O.K. for a satanist to be a mason? Maybe it is Luciferian?
You know- the ��whole man��
I'm so glad we have masons around to clear up all these things.
Feel free to spin all this.
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
Axeman, YOU cited the mason-disinfo site. I pointed that it is a disinfo site.
Originally posted by the sword of esus
whats the difference between the york rite and the scotish rite?
i heard that the york rite isnt masonic, how is that?
its not masonic cus it doesnt have degrees or what ?
i know nothin about masons just there degrees and thats about it
Originally posted by PublicGadfly
Axeman, YOU cited the mason-disinfo site. I pointed that it is a disinfo site. Don't throw on to me that which you wear.