9/11 In plane sight
forgivness please,if this has already been posted.
One particular interview that brought gasps from the audience and many looking around with shock etched on their faces was an interview conducted -
live at the time - by FOX News. This intense interview with Mark Burnback, an employee of FOX News, contains the following narrative, paraphrased:
Burnback was close to the path of the second plane and had a good long look at what he describes was not a commercial airliner. The plane that hit the
second tower had no windows, Burnback was very clear about that. The plane had some kind of blue logo on the front near the nose and looked like a
cargo plane. This point was driven to the viewer several times along with the comment from this FOX employee that "this plane wasn't from around
here or anything you'd see take off from the airport."
Other footage includes several women who had a very clear view watching the second plane hit were yelling, "That wasn't American Airlines....It
wasn't American Airlines going into the building." These interviews were played that morning once on FOX News, never to be replayed again, despite
the massive saturation and repetition by the media for many days to come.
Other extremely disturbing segments of this video are the clear, slow motion shots of the second plane going into the towers which show a flash right
before the nose of the plane hits the building and a pod attached to the bottom of the plane. This strange flash is clearly recorded from four
different angles from four different cameras. While there is only one known piece of film showing the first plane hitting the first tower, in slow
motion one can clearly see - as with the second plane - a flash from the nose section right before impact. What caused this?
This video raises extremely disturbing questions about the planes that hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Centers, but no conclusions or accusations
are made by the commentator. To date, only one piece of film has been released by DoD of the front of the Pentagon. The question raised in the video
is where is all the other film footage from the Pentagon? The heart beat of America's military and security, with a building and perimeter loaded
with cameras, but no film for the public to view of events as they unfolded except from one camera?
According to the producers, the purpose of '911 in Plane Site' is to demonstrate that Americans saw one thing that morning that was so shocking, so
horrific and so massive, the finer details weren't really being picked up. The producer reinforces to the viewer that after one broadcast of many
very controversial interviews live on the spot, these particular interviews were never broadcast again, i.e. firefighters on the spot talking about
the explosions and bombs inside the towers. Since 9-11, it has been reported that "Building Seven" collapsed because of the two World Trade Center
towers collapsing. However, the footage on this video tells a different story and raises more questions.
'911 in Plane Site,' distributed by Power Hour Productions (866-773-9469), leaves one with many questions as demonstrated by a very upset senior
citizen who requested her last name be withheld. Mary asked, "If these weren't commercial airliners, where are those flights? Where are the
passengers? My, God what really happened that day?" Indeed, this seemed to be the biggest question expressed by viewers after the lights came back
on, but for which there were no answers. Some viewers were visibly upset, angry and "want damn answers" from the Bush Administration. Others just
walked out the door in silence. One upset man commented on the way out of the viewing, "It's time to get this on PBS and every investigative news
program on TV. We need answers."