It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BUSTED! US, UK, back false-flag chemical attack in Syria

page: 7
141
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
In the event the Web Archive is scrubbed, here is a screen capture of the article.
DailyMail: U.S. backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime


guardian says it was forced to destroy computers and files
"The British government, accused of
abusing media freedom, said on Tuesday police
were right to detain a journalist and trash computers"

. . . looks like the rest is 'damage' control and attempts to
cover-up. : what does the government have to hide ? ? ?
________________
edit on 27/8/13 by ToneDeaf because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:12 PM
link   
No kidding, I was telling my grandparents about this months ago a few days before the syrian story broke on the news with the politicos acting as if they didn't know about the documented use of chemical weapons by rebels.

Vindication.



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:26 PM
link   
Do people realize how ridiculous this email exchange is?

"Like uhm, some Qatari's called and offered us big money for a chemical weapon, and it's not like we need permission from our own government, and besides those Qatari's swore the Yanks were totally cool with it.....ok fine just ship some over, it;s not like it will create an international outrage or something....".

Do defense contractors even have chemical weapons to sell to Middle Eastern characters as if they are running a little shop? Really?

They are not even an arms manufacturer and they are not the goverment. Do you really think they have chemical weapons laying around?



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeoParadigm
Do people realize how ridiculous this email exchange is?

"Like uhm, some Qatari's called and offered us big money for a chemical weapon, and it's not like we need permission from our own government, and besides those Qatari's swore the Yanks were totally cool with it.....ok fine just ship some over, it;s not like it will create an international outrage or something....".

Do defense contractors even have chemical weapons to sell to Middle Eastern characters as if they are running a little shop? Really?

They are not even an arms manufacturer and they are not the goverment. Do you really think they have chemical weapons laying around?






Think? No.

Know? Yes.



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:33 PM
link   
reply to post by teachtaire
 


So Britam Defence has chemical weapons laying around, and they ship em to well paying Qatari's apparently without having to answer to the British government?

How do you know? Can you offer some proof?



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:38 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:41 PM
link   
And if people believe the email, then why are they blaming UK? Judging by the email the contractors were conducting this deal, not the government. The US was mentioned but according to the email they were dealing with Qataris and they funded it.

Why is no one blaming the Qataris if they believe all this is true?

Where is the logic?
edit on 27-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by teachtaire

Originally posted by NeoParadigm
reply to post by teachtaire
 


So Britam Defence has chemical weapons laying around, and they ship em to well paying Qatari's apparently without having to answer to the British government?

How do you know? Can you offer some proof?


Shill much?


Really? I asked a question. You said you knew the answer. Is it too much to ask for you to back it up?

Shill?

For pointing out the idiocy here?

Please.
edit on 27-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 09:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeoParadigm
And if people believe the email, then why are they blaming UK? Judging by the email the contractors were conducting this deal, not the government. The US was mentioned but according to the email they were dealing with Qataris and they funded it.

Why is no one blaming the Qataris if they believe all this is true?

Where is the logic?
edit on 27-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)


It doesn't matter who DID it, it's the fact that the US government acts like they don't have a clue. Lies, lies, lies, and more lies. United We Lie.

I'm so #ing tired of it all. The lying has to stop.



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 09:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Xterrain
 





It doesn't matter who DID it,


What?????




I'm so #ing tired of it all. The lying has to stop.


Let's start with the lies right here.



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 09:46 PM
link   

The United Kingdom renounced the use of chemical and biological weapons in 1956 and subsequently destroyed its general stocks.


en.wikipedia.org...

But I guess UK based defense contractors have em laying around and play shop with them.


PS, I'm not saying the UK gov hasn't got chemical weapons in a secret facility somewhere.
edit on 27-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2013 @ 11:05 PM
link   
I have been looking through the files which contained the emails which were faked. And one of the photos led me to this guy.

en.wikipedia.org...

Yes a Swedish politician from Gothenburg who lived in New York City from 2006 to 2010, he is also a member of the Socialist Party USA, Has a wife who is in the UN. And he seems to be tied to Telecomix whos founders were from Gothenburg.

en.wikipedia.org...

Telecomix is tied to hacking and activism and that is what this email leaks were. Strange thing is I thought they were against Syria with the Syria Project they did a while ago. So why are they now pushing propaganda supporting Syria?

The Blue Coat Systems leak showing spy equipment was being used in Syria to spy on it's citizen and was being updated by US companies I thought was a good thing. But was this actually an act against the US and NSA spying on Syria? Was it a case like Haliburton and Koch Industries selling equipment to Iran in order to get STUXnet Virus in the nuclear power plant? Strange rabbit hole I found here folks.
edit on 27-8-2013 by JBA2848 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 12:37 AM
link   
Britam, is a U.K. Security Contractor, ala Xi, aka Blackwater. They have very deep pockets and make crap tons of money... and have connections to mil and ex-mil "contractors for hire" all over the planet. When you have access to 7 and 8 figure "resources" to incentivise an operation, and a large rolodex of seasoned badasses to call on... you can get just about everything you need.

ALSO, you naysayers might have just bothered to read the story. These were assets hacked from a private (apparently not very) secure server at Britam.

If we launch ordinance against Syria... we should just start impeachment proceedings as well as criminal investigations against all the players in the beltway.

Start with a couple of criminal trials, and hang a couple of elected officials, and televise it on national TV. Then, give a one time 60 day amnesty against capital punishment to everyone in government, provided they come clean and name names. Any withholding of evidence or lack of disclosure immediately voids the amnesty.

It would be like flushing the largest toilet in the solar system, and getting rid of all the S**T :-)



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 12:43 AM
link   
reply to post by dasman888
 





Britam, is a U.K. Security Contractor, ala Xi, aka Blackwater. They have very deep pockets and make crap tons of money... and have connections to mil and ex-mil "contractors for hire" all over the planet. When you have access to 7 and 8 figure "resources" to incentivise an operation, and a large rolodex of seasoned badasses to call on... you can get just about everything you need.


Like I pointed out, UK government has renounced chemical weapons in 1956.

You really think that these two defense contractors are selling chemical weapons in some skeme that bypasses the UK gov, to foreign nationals, and talk about this in emails?

If this email is real these guys would be facing charges right now.



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 12:47 AM
link   
The OP article was debunked. Anything related to Infowars should automatically go to the hoax bin



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 12:51 AM
link   
reply to post by aoxomoxoa
 


I don't get why it isn't in the HOAX bin either, just like I don't get why people flag obvious nonsense a 130 times.
edit on 28-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 12:54 AM
link   
Now its 130 flags.



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 01:04 AM
link   
reply to post by thesaneone
 


That just means that there are at least 130 willfully ignorant people



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 01:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by aoxomoxoa
reply to post by thesaneone
 


That just means that there are at least 130 willfully ignorant people


Because something like this wouldn't be covered up and labeled as a hoax? Right?

We can definitely trust the people who stand to gain by going to war; that is why they didn't lie to us about Iraq.

Looking at the history of users on this site, it becomes painfully obvious how the truth is handled. "Deny Ignorance" indeed.



posted on Aug, 28 2013 @ 01:36 AM
link   
reply to post by teachtaire
 


Despite all the points made you still believe this load of BS?




Because something like this wouldn't be covered up and labeled as a hoax? Right? We can definitely trust the people who stand to gain by going to war; that is why they didn't lie to us about Iraq. Looking at the history of users on this site, it becomes painfully obvious how the truth is handled. "Deny Ignorance" indeed.


Do you consider those arguments? They really are not, it is just empty drivel.
edit on 28-8-2013 by NeoParadigm because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
141
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join