It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LENDING
Syria : Lending By Volume (Millions Of US Dollars)
The World Bank does not have any recent lending to Syria.
World Bank
Delayed Article IV Consultation with Syria
Press Release No .13/294
August 2, 2013
On July 26, 2013 the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was informed that there could not be a briefing to the Board with an assessment of economic developments and policies in Syria, whose Article IV consultation is delayed by 26 months, due to a lack of adequate information that would allow staff to make such an assessment.
International Monetary Fund
^ see who's not a member and see where recent wars are ?
Role in banking supervision
The BIS provides the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision with its 17-member secretariat, and with it has played a central role in establishing the Basel Capital Accords of 1988 and 2004. There remain significant differences between United States, European Union, and United Nations officials regarding the degree of capital adequacy and reserve controls that global banking now requires. Put extremely simply, the United States, as of 2006, favoured strong strict central controls in the spirit of the original 1988 accords, while the EU was more inclined to a distributed system managed collectively with a committee able to approve some exceptions.
The UN agencies, especially ICLEI, are firmly committed to fundamental risk measures: the so-called triple bottom line and were becoming critical of central banking as an institutional structure for ignoring fundamental risks in favour of technical risk management.
Bank for International Settlements
A characteristic of the global financial and economic crisis that erupted in 2008 is that central banks have usurped the role of policy maker in sovereign states from the politicians. In the absence of coherent economic and fiscal policies in the United States, Japan, the eurozone and United Kingdom, central bankers have employed their power over the printing press with unprecedented vigor, unleashing a tidal wave of liquidity in a desperate effort to stave off a global economic depression. With the manipulative aplomb of a snake charmer, they have sought to push down interest rates to a point where short-term rates in most advanced economies are at virtually zero, while arousing confidence from investors and consumers who would have otherwise have little to cheer about.
The central bankers, in the minds of many, are the heroes of the economic crisis, supposedly saving the global economy from credit atrophy and demand destruction while the feckless politicians stood by helplessly. In case you would otherwise be unaware of the supposedly epic achievement performed by the central bankers, they have engaged themselves in a massive public relations drive during the crisis, paralleling their mega-liquidity dumps, seeking to persuade the public that central banks have become the new temples of salvation in an otherwise bleak economic and fiscal dystopia.
Have Central Banks Gone Too Far? A Warning From the Bank for International Settlements
Originally posted by wrabbit2000
Originally posted by TheRedneck
I guess we got tired of trying the "Arab Spring" approach... time for some direct action. Iran cannot have a local ally when they get attacked.
TheRedneck
That's precisely what I think it comes down to in a nutshell. Nothing more or less, in the end.
Iran always has been the ultimate target. Whats left of Persia has to join the New World Order, even if it kills them.
Maybe somebody's financing both sides ?
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by neo96
I thought I read somewhere that both Syria and Iran have a military agreement. Both defend if one it attacked from external forces.
A top Iranian military chief warned on Sunday that the U.S. will face “harsh consequences” if it intervenes in Syria over claims of chemical attacks, reported Agence France Presse citing a Fars new agency report.
“If the United States crosses this red line, there will be harsh consequences for the White House,” armed forces deputy chief of staff Massoud Jazayeri was quoted as saying
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Assad lies. He kills. Obama lies. He kills. The 'Rebels' lie. They kill.
I don't believe anything that any of them say.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by neo96
I thought I read somewhere that both Syria and Iran have a military agreement. Both defend if one it attacked from external forces.
So why would a Islamic state 'defend' a secular country like Assad ?
Doesn't make sense to me.
They might have a 'defense' pact, but in the course of history we have seen how much they are really worth.
Originally posted by RP2SticksOfDynamite
Originally posted by dominicus
After Bush/Cheney WMD's B.S. spiel, I believe this as much as a believe in Unicords.
If Syria really does have chem-weapons, then I bet you a hundred grand, the US Mil-Industrial complex sold them the chems in the first place a few months back, knowing they can use this to "justify" invasions.
I'm guessing Russia has Syria's back? And this could get messy?
Russia will not get involved if Syria has used chemics! They will be angry and embarrassed for sure!!
Syrai and Iran need change however it comes!! New dawns only come after bloody ones!!
I dont think Russia really gives a rats ar.e about Syria and Ass-ad!
We shall see soon enough...
Originally posted by Senduko
Also, not a fan of prophecies myself, however there was this one end times prediction that said the first sign would be Damascus burning.
Would love to know which one that was exactly.