It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aazadan
2. Legal weapons have to be turned in. Over time, all legal guns eventually turn to illegal guns as relatives die and people inherit them or burglaries are committed to find weapons (which would happen when they stop being for sale on the streets). In essence, there has to be nothing for the criminals to steal.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Gun control does work at a national level. Just look at every country that has it and compare violent crimes rates. Nobody can dispute that. However, that matters not as the Constitution allows the right to own guns. Do let the anti gun control crowd make you look like an idiot by having you defend a position that 1. your wrong about and 2, has no bearing on the debate.
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
I really cant understand that since in these threads were basically just wishing for things why cant we wish for guns to be in the hands of NO ONE!!!!!
You can't be trusted is what they are saying to gun owners.
You have to beg government's permission to own a gun.
The anti gun proponents will passionately vilify gun owners, then turn around and shout, 'don't you dare pass voter ID laws'.
Originally posted by Khaleesi
Yes confiscation of legal weapons has worked soooo well throughout history right? Right? Riiiiiight.
libertycrier.com...
"Documentary showing that “gun control” has historically been used to disarm citizens and make them helpless before governments commit genocide. Dramatically covers major genocides in the Soviet Union, Germany, Uganda, Rwanda, China, Turkey, and other countries.Shows how “gun control” in the U.S. has been used to victimize blacks, Indians, children, women, and others.Combines gut-level emotional appeal and fast-paced, powerful graphics with a cool statement of historic facts and quotes from the relevant laws."
Originally posted by Aazadan
It has turned out well for citizens just as often as it has turned out poorly historically.
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by Xtrozero
Seems like theres 2 types of people in this issue.
1 type when you ask them to imagine a hypothetical world COMPLETELY without guns, they wont see violence and will take it to mean its most likely a peaceful society and imagine everything that comes with it.
The 2nd type will talk about the next best weapon they can get their hands on
Originally posted by Khaleesi
Originally posted by Aazadan
It has turned out well for citizens just as often as it has turned out poorly historically.
??????? Please show me where it has turned out well for citizens. Maybe for a time, all is well but, do you truly trust that ALL future leaders will be kind to their citizens? A nation without arms will ALWAYS have benevolent leaders? Power will corrupt SOMEONE at some point and what will happen. History will happen.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by Xtrozero
Seems like theres 2 types of people in this issue.
1 type when you ask them to imagine a hypothetical world COMPLETELY without guns, they wont see violence and will take it to mean its most likely a peaceful society and imagine everything that comes with it.
The 2nd type will talk about the next best weapon they can get their hands on
Since humans are the most vicious animal on the planet which scenario do you think is correct?
Originally posted by Aazadan
Originally posted by Khaleesi
Originally posted by Aazadan
It has turned out well for citizens just as often as it has turned out poorly historically.
??????? Please show me where it has turned out well for citizens. Maybe for a time, all is well but, do you truly trust that ALL future leaders will be kind to their citizens? A nation without arms will ALWAYS have benevolent leaders? Power will corrupt SOMEONE at some point and what will happen. History will happen.
That happens with or without arms. Look at what is happening in the US right now. Our president can suspend elections, congress has been bought out by corporations, there are serious concerns that the NSA can blackmail congress/judges, while each and every one of our rights (this includes the second) have either been marginalized or flat out only exist in theory now. This has all happened while we (or atleast those of us outside of DC, Chicago, and NYC) have guns. Even under Hitler most citizens of Germany were allowed to have guns, it was only Jews that couldn't really.
The way you prevent dictators is through actually being involved in politics. Apathy and lack of transparency are what lets individuals become tyrants. When leaders are accountable and administrations are transparent these things are cut down. This is why we have such a problem now, everything important is classified/national security. This principal applies to more than just governments... look at our financial sector and what has happened when they're allowed to hide what they're doing.
If you want examples of where gun control has turned out ok for citizens, just pick a random country in Europe, there's quite a few of them last I looked and almost all of them practice some form of gun control. The reason it works there however, and won't work here I already outlined above in those 4 points.