It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Understanding them does not equal agreeing with you.
I am not mixing it up, the abzu is the watery abyss, under the abbys is located the udnerworld
Enki go's into the abzu, he is a fish.
Because entering the abzu was done thru a temple, a door.
Here is Enki exiting the abzu
She is the dragon, she is depicted as a snake, this before any summerian culture existed.
She is passed on from pre sumerian cultures into sumeria, as the sumerians seems they god some of their deities from somewhere else, specialy the ones that they start out with.
There are two waters the salty waters and the sweet waters, the salty waters are depicted as a dragon, Tiamat, not the Abzu.
It does because Babylon is next in history after Akkadians but the babylonians took the story and inflated things, mixed characters, added other characters, invented them. But the epic of creation is not influenced, it's a whole different thing with Marduk making humans out of tiamat's flesh.
Enki goes into his TEMPLE Abzu.
His TEMPLE Abzu, which is not the same as the Deity/place Abzu.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
His temple abzu is the same as the abzu, the temple is the entrence into the abzu.
According to biblical texts, there's a hidden door to the "Abyss" and "Bottomless Pit" in the vicinity of the Euphrates river, a star gate of sorts. It has been there, buried under the ruins of the ancient Mesopotamian city of Eridu, for thousands of years
The Abzu or Engur, is further described as a doorway from which Enki-Ea arrived on the Earth and over which he built the Temple of E.ABZU at Eridu, to facilitate its usage.
His TEMPLE Abzu.
TEMPLE.
Temple
Deity/place
freshwaters on land
different
get it?
What EXACTLY are you referring to here? You are aware that there were more than one Sumerian serpent deity, aren't you?
Abzu/Asag/Kur for another.
Neither of these are Nammu, and both of these are serpents/dragons.
I already know the Babylonian epic of creation.
This is not what we are talking about.
We are talking about the evolving mythologies of converging cultures.
As I pointed out to you - it's not just my professional opinion, it is also the professional opinion of Kramer and Speiser, without whom you'd have no translated tablets to misunderstand.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Latin has 3 mods, masculin, feminine and neuntral. I don't see where I lack what you say.
I don';t see how it does, neutral can be masculine as in a man. It is not a retarted theory.
Lus does not change the gender, you have the documentation on the wiki, it only makes the noun diminuative look younger.
So let me help you with lum
Same as:
-la
The original form is LUS, from the male, then the other suffixes come after LUS
Seems you have your head in the clouds, it's a copy of lus.
What does it say ?
1. nominative neuter singular of -lus
Meaning the root word EL is masculine
Now say after me EL-LUS original, second LA, third LUM.
LUS represents the root word ? I presume, not changing it's gender ?
Say after me first there was adamskiel, god riped a part from adamski and created adamskiela.
First was adamskiel then adamskiela not the other way around, first LUS then the others.
That is your view, I view is as the root plus the suffix. The root word is EL.
It's not ficto latin at all, Ille =EL ille = masculine, wake up.
EL is the root word from the suffix, remember it's EL+SUFFIX
Well yes there are 3 geners, just like in the case of EL, I don't see how this proves your point.
Lus does not make modifications to the gender of the root word, it only makes the root younger as in a child and that is about it. LUM makes modification to the gender making it neutral, but only it some terms.
For this you need to take a look at EL-LUS.
...I don't like insulting people.
Originally posted by pepsi78
It is The temple of Enki., the temple is just an entrence to the abzu, he built the temple on top of the entrence.
This is according to the Stargate show, the movie series. It's where they god the idea for the show, with a gate deep down in the secure facility.
Ahahaha.
Poor Cody. This is what he does with me when he cites as evidence Star Wars and Star Trek during a debate.
For your rebuttal you should call on the Tooth Fairy.
Originally posted by pepsi78
What you posted comes from lus, lum and la are representatives of lus, making lus first the main.
Lus is masculine because of it's root. Lum is a representation of Lus modified.
The word is EL-LUS as in a child boy. El being a he , a man. Other suffixes came after this and are based on the original LUS.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Satanists backing eachother, interesting, not that I want to judge, you may beilive in who ever you want.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by pepsi78
What you posted comes from lus, lum and la are representatives of lus, making lus first the main.
Lus is masculine because of it's root. Lum is a representation of Lus modified.
The word is EL-LUS as in a child boy. El being a he , a man. Other suffixes came after this and are based on the original LUS.
No Mr. Ficto-Latin Fraudster. The suffixes are based on the noun, not the other way around.
Why did you ever pretend to understand Latin?
en.wiktionary.org...
-lum
1. nominative neuter singular of -lus
2. accusative masculine singular of -lus
3. accusative neuter singular of -lus
4. vocative neuter singular of -lus
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by pepsi78
Satanists backing eachother, interesting, not that I want to judge, you may beilive in who ever you want.
What does Cody's spirituality have to do with you not understanding subjects? Biased much?
Originally posted by pepsi78
The suffixs come from LUS , Lus being the original. Lus in turn represents the the root giving it a younger tone, others modify the gender.
This means that the other suffixs came from lus, and that lus is the main suffix
As for my ficto-latin remember it's EL-LUS
Originally posted by pepsi78
Nothing at all, I told him if he wants to be a real satanist to join the masons, it's the real deal.
No, the suffix is based on the noun. Sorry, you just do not understand Latin and it is now glaringly obvious. I would have thought you would have made an effort by now to at least learn the basics but you keep pretending to know what you are talking about.
There is 'no main' suffix. Adjectives in Latin have gender-specific forms because their forms are determined by the gender, case, and number of the nouns they modify. Nouns almost always have a single gender except for male and female animals, or the occasional noun with gender identity issues. There are first declension nouns that terminate in '-a' which you, with your limited knowledge, would believe to be feminine when they are indeed masculine. Latin could have been your friend but you abused it and now it makes you look foolish.
en.wiktionary.org...
-lum
1. nominative neuter singular of -lus
2. accusative masculine singular of -lus
3. accusative neuter singular of -lus
4. vocative neuter singular of -lus
I see how you completely avoided commenting on how you got the Romans to use modern pronouns. Any word on that one? "
en.wiktionary.org...
Nominative ille illa illud
At the same time, you cannot say "Yes what i say is true because I JUST WROTE IT". That fact of you feebly typing on a forum isn't the arbiter of truth. You are not more reputable than anyone here let alone scholars who have studied this material for thousands of years.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by pepsi78
Yes I did...
No, you did not. You avoided the specifics.
What does 'porcellam' mean?
What does 'porcellis' mean?
Answer the questions.
porcel, porcel is a he pig.
'Porcel' is not how you say 'pig' in Latin. Maybe in Ficto-Latin.
Flaming while loosing, I understand you, it's not easy loosing.after all the insulting things you have said.
The only one who is loosing is the one not answering questions my little Latin imposter. Prove to everyone you know more than Ficto-Latin. Answer the question.
Well pepsi, you are always right, correct? please stand up and answer this ! Defend your intelligence !!
edit on 19-7-2011 by AugustusMasonicus because: Networkdude has no beer.
Originally posted by pepsi78
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus
Your question has nothing to do with LUS, you are deviating from the subject.
From EL ELA, to other suffixes not used on EL.
Porcelus is relevant because of the lus suffix, making porcel a he pig, just like the EL.
Let me explain to you so you can understand.
Porc"EL" He pork. Porc"EL"LUS baby he pig.
HE=EL.
LUS=Young. LUS only adds a age suffix and represents the original meaning of the root word, it modifies only the age and represents the root gender.
It's not my fault I can uderstand Latin. It's because the language I speak.
Oh, We didnt know you spoke Latin ! The same latin that has been accepted for thousands of years, or your own pseudo/crypto latin that only you yourself understand or created? Please, this can be groundbreaking !
edit on 19-7-2011 by pepsi78 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by pepsi78
Nothing at all, I told him if he wants to be a real satanist to join the masons, it's the real deal.
If you say so. You probably read about it in Star Wars, right Darth Ceauşescu?