It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Fort Hood, Texas (CNN) -- [Breaking news alert, 1:37 p.m.]
A military jury has convicted Army Maj. Nidal Hasan of 13 counts of murder and 32 counts of attempted murder in a November 5, 2009, shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, making it possible for the death penalty to be considered as a possible punishment.
military jury considering the fate of Maj. Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist charged with massacring soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, resumed deliberations Friday morning in the death penalty case.
Hasan is charged with 13 counts of murder and 32 counts of attempted murder in the November 5, 2009, shooting rampage at a deployment processing center where prosecutors say he targeted soldiers he was set to deploy with to Afghanistan.
Hypocritical? Just as immoral?
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by sheepslayer247
There are some things, that deserve death. Mass murder is one of them.
And status as a martyr in the same process? That is a fine line to be walking.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
I thought this case was pretty cut and dry as well. From what I have read, he was guilty without a doubt.
But I find it funny that we find him guilty of murdering people....and then will most likely kill him for it.
Hypocritical? Just as immoral?
Here's the question. Is a person, like that, worth 80 to 120 thousand a year of tax payer money?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by neo96
I gave you a star Neo, because you are right. Hassan deserves what he gets.
I'm just asking...if we put him to death are we any "more moral"?
There are a few though, like crimes against children or mass murder, than well, I'm OK with that.