It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

After FBI says “We have Dismantled Anonymous”, Anons hacked them to show the presence

page: 1
8
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:16 PM
link   



FBI says that they have dismantled the Anonymous group of hackers because most of its “largest players” have been arrested or detained by US law enforcement authorities.
But do you think, something like this, NO because everything is going invert of this just after this announcement from FBI that they have cut down Anonymous in pieces or dismantled them, Anonymous group of hackers dumped large amounts of data that appears to have been stolen from FBI servers.


hackersnewsbulletin.com...



I find it kind of funny really. You do not dismantle an idea by arresting a few people. Reminds me a little of the HBgary hack after they said they had identified key members had their internet security company in ruins. Please do not link to any dumps on ATS.




posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:19 PM
link   
How can the FBI "dismantle" an IDEA?!

Oh, they need to stop smoking whatever they are toking on. It's rotting their brains and making them mushy. I really thought better than the FBI, to think they could eradicate a mere mental concept. What friggin idiots.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Wow, i feel safe and secure knowing the world is so much safer from this Terrorist Organization LULZ.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 




LOL....! Seriously are these peeps of the FBI for real..? Haha they think Anonymous is dismantled. You cannot arrest an idea fools..!

Clearly they were lacking in brain cells when they came up with this...



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:55 PM
link   
Anon is a group. I don't know why you say it isn't. Aren't they hackers with specific ideological viewpoint who commit crimes? Don't they, like, organize attacks together?

You all make it sound like a bunch of people, of all viewpoint and skills, just decide to hack the FBI one day.

I'm pretty sure when you make a coordinated effort to hack the feds, you would be considered part of a group. Not just some vague, abstract idea.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


This is the point of Anonymous. ANYONE CAN BE. It's not a core group, it's a movement. It is freedom, it is expression. It's an art form, a demonstration of initiative and vision. It's an idea. And whoever acts on that idea, is now...Anonymous.
edit on 23-8-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   
For me it is just sad that the arrest of a few does make a difference. Especially when the majority of the 99 percent are just complacent about everything. Take the fact we know they have been snooping through your emails and phone calls but no one seems to care. The Bot



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by purplemer
 


This is the point of Anonymous. ANYONE CAN BE. It's not a core group, it's a movement. It is freedom, it is expression. It's an art form, a demonstration of initiative and vision. It's an idea. And whoever acts on that idea, is now...Anonymous.
edit on 23-8-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)


We don't need anymore shadowy anonymous organizations deciding what is best for the world, thank you. If we are so dissatisfied with the current situation we will make changes through the proper, more defined, channels available to us.

Have a nice day.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:04 PM
link   
reply to post by TsukiLunar
 





Anon is a group


I do not see Anon as a group. It is simply an idea.


First and foremost, Anonymous is NOT a group, or an organization, or coherent collective of any sort. Anonymous is more like...an idea, a concept. Technically everyone and anyone is Anonymous. It's simply the name given to any collective action carried out virally by a large mass of people. Its ranks, goals, intentions and ideals are completely fluid, changing as easily as the wind. It's a kind of social ocean that occasionally builds itself up into a massive tsunami of sheer social willpower. The ocean isn't organized, it's not a sentient presence, it's not a "group", it merely is what it is...nature. THAT is what Anonymous is, it is simply the collective social nature of the Internet itself.


encyclopediadramatica.se...
edit on 23-8-2013 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:07 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


Abstract philosophical notions do not hack the FBI!



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:09 PM
link   
reply to post by TsukiLunar
 





We don't need anymore shadowy anonymous organizations deciding what is best for the world, thank you. If we are so dissatisfied with the current situation we will make changes through the proper, more defined, channels available to us.


You really think the proper channels work. The system is corrupt and needs changing. Bradley Manning tried using the correct channels. It did not work for him. The laws in place protect the corporations and banks they are there to protect the money.

What defined channels are you talking about. Voting..? If that really changed anything it would be illegal too....



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by purplemer
 


Abstract philosophical notions do not hack the FBI!


Thanks for your reply....

Yes they do and they did..

edit on 23-8-2013 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Where is the data they released?
edit on 23-8-2013 by onequestion because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 





Bradley Manning tried using the correct channels.


Releasing massive amounts of classfied information to another shadowy unknown entity is not "The proper channels!"



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 





Thanks for your reply....


Your welcome.




Yes they do and they did..


No they don't!



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by purplemer
 





Thanks for your reply....


Your welcome.




Yes they do and they did..


No they don't!

Don't be squared, I mean scarred oops scared...
twozo for Oozo



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by TsukiLunar
 



We don't need anymore shadowy anonymous organizations deciding what is best for the world, thank you. If we are so dissatisfied with the current situation we will make changes through the proper, more defined, channels available to us.


Yeah...people who do that get shot. There's a reason Batman wears a mask.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:57 PM
link   


We don't need anymore shadowy anonymous organizations deciding what is best for the world, thank you. If we are so dissatisfied with the current situation we will make changes through the proper, more defined, channels available to us.

Have a nice day.


um, yeah... people have tried for decades to use the "proper" channels..

and have gotten no where.

we do not need more of the same.
edit on 23-8-2013 by reeferman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by TsukiLunar
 





Releasing massive amounts of classfied information to another shadowy unknown entity is not "The proper channels!"



Again I state he did try and use the appropriate channels and they did not work..


In 2010, while stationed at Forward Operating Base Hammer in Baghdad, Pfc. Bradley Manning decided to approach a superior officer in his chain of command to voice his concern about something he had stumbled upon in his capacity as an intelligence analyst. His unit had been helping Iraqi federal police identify suspects for detention and discovered that fifteen men had been arrested for producing “anti-Iraqi literature." After having a high-resolution photo of the “literature” translated into English, Manning discovered that the writing was hardly criminal; it was a "scholarly critique" of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. But his superior officer did not want to hear about it. Manning knew if he continued to assist the police in identifying political opponents, innocent people would be jailed, likely tortured, and “not seen again for a very long time, if ever,” as he told a military courtroom in Fort Meade, MD on February 28. Hoping to expose what was happening ahead of the Iraq parliamentary election, on March 7, 2010, Manning shared the information with WikiLeaks.


www.thenation.com...#



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
...a bunch of people, of all viewpoint and skills, decide[d] to hack the FBI one day.

Nailed it.

edit on 23-8-2013 by xmaox because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
8
<<   2 >>

log in

join