New UK Germ Warfare Experiments Planned?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 11-11-2004 @ 06:47 PM by zero lift
Ever wondered if the UK Government would repeat their 1960s-1970s Biological Warfare experiments?

You know, the ones where they sprayed massive amounts of live bacteria over populated areas of southern England.










According to the penultimate paragraph of this letter, should the MOD decide that there was a military need, they would not only repeat the experiments but they would be conducted on a larger scale.




After the events of 2001, both the UK and US Governments have spent large sums of money on BW research, especially in the field of detection. It seems highly likely that the MOD have decided that research into the detection of a large scale BW attack was necessary. According to this letter, that could mean larger scale public area biological warfare experiments than those conducted by MRE Porton Down from 1963-1975 in Dorset.

At the moment, when questioned as whether they are conducting BW detection experiments in public areas of the UK, Porton Down will only state that they do not comment on operational matters.


zero lift


reply posted on 12-11-2004 @ 08:20 PM by zero lift
stumason wrote

The MOD never distributed live Bacteria. If you actually read the letter, it states it used Zinc Cadmium Sulphide, which is a simulant. And the UK wasn't the only country to do it.


You couldn't be more wrong.

That letter was a reply to questions that I had sent to DERA. The fourth paragraph starts" You also requested information about current procedures governing open air trials in public areas." This was a catch all question. I was referring to any type of simulant, chemical or biological.

If you read

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE POSSIBLE HEALTH HAZARDS OF THE LARGE-SCALE RELEASE OF BACTERIA DURING THE DORSET DEFENCE TRIALS

you will find that the MOD consistently sprayed massive amounts of live bacteria across populated areas of southern England, and in particular Dorset, from 1963-1975.

You will also discover that on at least four occasions the MRE Porton Down sprayed massive amounts of contaminated bacterial suspension over the population of Dorset.

The first page of the Independent Review states;

"A. The nature of the bacteria and viruses released into the environment
The great majority of the experimental releases of bacteria in the 1960's and 1970s involved four species - Escherichia coli, Bacillus globigii, Bacterium aerogenes and Serratia marcescens.

Some of the experiments involved the release of killed bacteria but in most experiments the bacteria were not killed before they were sprayed across the South of England. The health hazards associated with the four bacteria used in the experiments are outlined below. I then describe the properties of the other bacteria (or bacterial viruses) that were used in a few experiments, which in most cases were not part of the Dorset Defence Trials."


zero lift


reply posted on 12-11-2004 @ 09:41 PM by zero lift
You haven't answered my question; Are you saying it's OK to spray massive quantities of living bacteria across populated areas as it would only be dangerous to certain, highly suceptible individuals?



The mass aerial spraying of e-coli is insignificant as the bacteria would die.


The bacteria were sprayed at night, during the winter months for the express reason of ensuring they reached their target areas before dying. In other words, residents of the target areas would have inhaled and ingested the E.coli before they had a chance to die.

In later trials, the E.coli were encapsulated in a protective substance in order to keep them alive in daylight and in a contaminated environment.



It's important to remember that these bacteria were deliberately sized in order to mimic a real BW agent. That is, they were sized to get past the body's natural defences and reach the alvioli, the deepest part of the lung.



They where only used in that experiment to compare how far spores travel compared to normal bacterium


Wrong. I don't know where you got that information from? Even Porton Down haven't tried to say that.

E.coli and Bacillus subtilis were used together in the experiments.

If you suffered from a serious underlying disease, these experiments were potentially lethal. According to Prof Spratt the experiments could have caused blood poisoning or pneumonia, neither of which are to be treated lightly.

You have to remember that not many people in the Government were aware of these experiments. No official Government policy permission was asked for or given for them to be conducted. Authority rested with the Director of MRE Porton Down.

For that reason alone, it makes a mockery of saying that the MOD wouldn't risk harming people. Hardly anyone in the MOD new about them. If you check the history of the MRE Porton Down you will find it was autonomous, a law unto itself.


zero lift



[edit on 12-11-2004 by zero lift]


reply posted on 13-11-2004 @ 02:02 PM by zero lift
stumason wrote

am aware of the place, I am also aware of other experiments that the MOD has done. Mostly on willing subjects I might add. And some where rather amusing, others slightly more disturbing...But hey, back on topic:

My highlights.


Just in case anyone else agrees with stumason that most Porton "volunteers" were willing subjects, I would like to remind you that Porton Down conducted these experiments without obtaining informed consent from the servicemen.

Informed consent means that you have had the experiment's procedure and it's likely side-effects, both short and long term, explained to you. You are also made aware that you can withdraw from the experiment whenever you wish, without repercussions.

Informed consent was not the practice at Porton Down.

An accurate account of the Chemical Warfare experiments that were performed on Service personnel at Porton Down can be found in Rob Evans book,
Gassed

Synopsis
For 80 years, scientists at Porton Down have sought to develop deadly and destructive chemical weapons within one of Britain's most secretive installations. Thousands of human volunteers were subjected to a programme of often ruthless medical testing yet their stories have remained untold. Now many are claiming they are suffering the long-term effects from these tests with serious damage to their health and a police enquiry has been launched. In this daring new publication, journalist Robert Evans investigates the ethics and actions of the scientists and survivors of Porton Down.


zero lift
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags
What were those sounds in the sky? - Explained
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags
Reports of Rumbling in the Sky: Pulsejet Technology?
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags