It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does the guaranteed right to public access mean the business owner's private right to exclude is violated? For the most part, courts have decided that the constitutional interest in providing equal access to public accommodations outweighs the individual liberties involved.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by sonnny1
Exactly, allow the ideas of free people to flourish (or die) in the free market exchange of ideas. The State can not deny the KKK to adopt a highway no more than they can of an abortion clinic. If they did, I would be defending the rights of the abortion clinic even if it was against my personal beliefs.....my literal forefather fought for this.
John Adams Defends British Soldiers
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by Jahari
reply to post by ownbestenemy
I see you can't handle being wrong.
So are you saying all parking lots are public property? Please say yes and show how totally misinformed you are.edit on 21-8-2013 by Jahari because: (no reason given)
You are assuming they are. This lot is not the Governments.....what are you missing. It is a private lot. Either you are trolling or are so obtuse you just cannot see that.
I never said all lots are public nor have I said they are all private. It is a case by case issue. If we are talking about the County Courthouse...then we have a different stance -- but that isn't what we are talking about now is it.
Originally posted by amkia
It’s his house thus his rules; I don’t see any problem with that. But to be honest, turn that sign to Jews instead of Muslims then see how they react WORLDWIDE.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by Jahari
And a large portion of parking lots are.........private property; you do know this right?
Sorry didn't realize I needed to spell that out but the large portion of parking lots and other areas you pull into to get your pizza or wings or medicine are private lots. Typically owned by a developer but sometimes by the business owner. .
Either way, they are not State property and they are privately owned.
Here is a fun question for you:
You claim that because they specifically called out Muslims in their prohibition -- is that any different than say "No yellow cars allowed"?
Originally posted by Jahari
I'm not going to trivialize this by talking about yellow cars. On topic your wrong sir. It takes a big man/woman to admit it
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
it was crass and idiotic.
Originally posted by Jahari
I'm not going to trivialize this by talking about yellow cars. On topic your wrong sir. It takes a big man/woman to admit it
Originally posted by neo96
Well if business is getting hurt by people who are not going to be doing there business at the mall, and just using it to park to go to the mosque.
He has ever right to do so.
Sorry.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by roadgravel
if your theory is correct then why can't everyone park in handicapped spots in any parking lot, anywhere, anytime ????
ps ... parking is not a function of any religion, hence, no legal violation.
not saying it was a good example of anything but foolishness but it certainly was not illegal.
and yet again, leave to the light-weights to fuss over such nonsense while the world around them devolves into complete chaos