posted on Aug, 21 2013 @ 08:54 PM
I follow your threads and comments, for your critical analytical mind is obvious,and therefore, I am always interested in what you have to
However, sometimes I do find you may betray a certain constant sentiment of defense that makes you SEEM like an illuminati cheerleader, of sorts, vis
a vis comments about Rockefellers, etc.
And I'm neither dissing not judging that family, as I know none of them personally, and am the type who is careful to reserve judgement, if I have
nothing other than what I'm spoon fed from external sources, second, third or whatever hand info.....before I discern what MAY BE true or what may
not be. In other words, I try hard to keep my mind open......for many are judged by the "machine" of media, culture, politics, which has almost, in
my estimation, become some kind of infection beyond all control or even the controllers of it, if such exist.... I'm not replying to you to debate
that, one way or another.
I enjoyed and resonated with LizardSlicks response to you.
I find you extremely intelligent (not like my stupid mind is any judge, mind you), but am weary of you not seeming to recognize at least SOME
conspiracy effort, and something, perhaps still undefinable to name......
And that brings me to my point: labels, stereotypes, what I call "slotting."
Language is a powerful tool. How we connect, and disconnect. You and I have explored the same kinds of thread exploring this concept down to its
bones. Obviously, to me, there is some manipulation of external and personal internal life going on here. That is all I would wish you to admit to,
or perhaps, see. There is a reason we are watched the way we are, our information collected, collated and dispersed to one agency or another....and
surely, we can agree, now, this is truly happening. It isn't just because those agencies are full of voyeurs, or looking for some kind of ethereal
justice to keep people "safe." Is it? Can we at least agree upon that.
Stereotypes are reinforced daily, in a variety of external, circumstantial, public, dogmatic, religious, media, advertising ways, daily. Would you
agree, at least to that? What would you think would be the purpose of that?
Do you believe in quantum, theoretical physics, or the possibility of a sentient quantum computer?
For all these questions, really, address on a deeper level what your thread is about. Can we agree it seems we are repeating certain history,
repetitively, and without any labelling of any group, or pointing any fingers, agree that is occurring?
And I wonder what you think of nature, really? Let me explain. A few years ago, a certain celebrity did a documentary type film on insects and
invertebrates, flies, earthworms, etc, and their "social" or breeding habits and biology. Such as,certain mollusks displaying downright
sadistic/masochistic mating behaviour, stabbing their mates, to inject the necessary sperm or component to fertilize the female's eggs.......
I bring this up, because I am a middle aged woman, and when I studied biology in college years ago, this was not a part of the lexicon of the habits
of mollusk mating in any way whatsoever.....as though "nature" has, in fact, evolved into something totally different than those of us old enough to
remember who studied those biological processes at one time, ever remember it being this exploitative.......
Sincerely and always appreciate your thoughts: