It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benrl
Heres one.
Cut term limit down to one term.
Lobbying becomes expensive, and party diversity could thrive.
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by Aazadan
lol... just lol.
You claim that idea would never work... Yet your No.1 idea would NEVER work.
Every heard of living within your means?
No? Don't think so... Not a lot of people do.
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by Aazadan
It doesn't at all... Do you think all the illegal contributions and bribes they get are actually reported to your IRS?
You are in denial if you think it does.
The point is, they WILL rip the system as far as they can legally, then they will just go to the back channels as per normal.
All you will be doing is giving them more legal money.
True to an extent it MAY prevent new members of congress from taking up bribes and the likes... but you first need to purge the oldies that know how to work the system.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Aazadan
Term limits.
Pay them the same rate as a GS.
Give them the same health insurance as the rest of us.
They aren't "special". They aren't "better". They aren't "smarter", "wiser" than the rest of us.
As a matter of fact, I'm all for a "Bitch-Slap" Congress day. (Maybe extend it for a month or two)
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by Aazadan
Not a bad idea overall. It has some kinks to work out, but I think getting people to agree with it will be tough. Everyone has their own way and the only people that can decide this is the congress. Therein is the problem. We would have to get a constitutional amendment passed by all the states.
Originally posted by Helig
* Term caps for all elected officials, they can serve no more time in their office than the President can in the WH
* All forms of lobbying outlawed, all campaigns are financed at a fixed amount provided by the government.
* Congressional pay is dropped to minimum wage and will remain there.
* Attendance - each member MUST attend at least 80% of all votes or else they face removal from office
Making them actually work is of course highly unpopular, and busting their pay down to the level of those who are most harshly impacted by their decisions could probably only be done by gunpoint. The sad fact of the matter is there is nothing we can do to make them actually earn the piles of cash they get paid to sit around and say "yes/no".
Originally posted by Aazadan
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Aazadan
Term limits.
Pay them the same rate as a GS.
Give them the same health insurance as the rest of us.
They aren't "special". They aren't "better". They aren't "smarter", "wiser" than the rest of us.
As a matter of fact, I'm all for a "Bitch-Slap" Congress day. (Maybe extend it for a month or two)
While that might feel nice. Congress is in charge of making the rules for congress. They would never pass a bitch slap congress day, or vote themselves a decrease in pay. When dealing with congress you need to think about game theory and apply various parts of it to all dealings with them. Each one of them will make the decision that's best for an individual member. They may not be special, better, smarter, or wiser than the rest of us but they are more powerful and that power brings people that will exchange favors with them.
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by Aazadan
Not a bad idea overall. It has some kinks to work out, but I think getting people to agree with it will be tough. Everyone has their own way and the only people that can decide this is the congress. Therein is the problem. We would have to get a constitutional amendment passed by all the states.
I believe congress would pass something like this, almost unanimously (a couple super wealthy holdouts would oppose it... I would be all for writing special exemptions to those specific members of a higher wealth cap to even get them on board) so trying to go through the states (which will never work) wouldn't need to happen. Why try to hold a congress seat for 20-40 years just to retire with maybe 10 million dollars? They could work 1/2 to 1/4 as long and retire with 10 times the wealth while freeing themselves from corporate chains that they only accept for much needed money.
Originally posted by beezzer
The power congress weilds is only what we allow them to have.
(food for thought)
This puts in softcaps and prices lobbyists out of the game. As I said before, if you pay congress less they're just going to look elsewhere to make money. It's the same concept as paying your vital employees a lot in business. Upper management always makes much more than everyone else, and that's because they have information vital to the business. You want to keep them there, and you want them loyal. Paying congress more is an extension of that idea. If they have more money, they're less likely to look for more sources of funding (and even if they do a cap on net wealth limits how much they can walk away with). If the people seek to have an adversarial relationship with congress, that's exactly what they're going to get. When it's the people that are setting them up for life rather than the corporations though, we would get better results.