This is not the old Nibiru/Jupiter-sized/Planet-X story you've already seen.
Please read on...
Some while back, in late June of 2013, an image appeared on the internet showing a seemingly spherical object right next to the sun bathed in a
greenish light. This object was claimed to be Nibiru or Jupiter or an asteroid etc. but was presented with no more evidence than a single screenshot
which did not reveal the entire picture.
This is why many seem to brush off this story as old news. A superficial examination of this phenomenon creates a sensation for a while and then dies
uninvestigated. But I guarantee you've never seen anything like this before.
I re-created the conditions for viewing this image and this due diligence led me to the astounding new evidence presented herein.
These objects cannot be explained as anything which follows an orbital path as they do not seem to move, at least not in the time-lapse between
recorded images. There is one notable exception to this in which motion seems to be recorded although it is not known whether this is a result of
satellite movement or movement of the objects.
All images were taken from Helioviewer.org (a NASA site) and come from a pair of satellites called Stereo A (ahead) and Stereo B (behind.) These
satellites have been orbiting the sun since 2007 and are sensitive to both the visible spectrum and UV wavelengths. The instruments which have
recorded this phenomenon are Cor1 and Cor2 which are said to use white light. These instruments may be able to see into the near UV spectrum like some
insects do. There is no official claim that Cor1&2 are UV sensitive, but they would only have to be slightly more sensitive than our eyes.
I took screenshots of days, hours, minutes and even seconds before and after the first 'Nibiru' image, and sequenced them using PhotoShop to align,
rotate, and crop. No other alterations were made to the original images and they were then turned into animated .gifs with Image Ready. These results
can be reproduced by anyone interested.
Based on this new information, some points became painfully obvious.
1- The objects have been there as long as the satellites which took their pictures have been in orbit and are still
2- Nasa has been covering something up (no big surprise here.)
3- The objects are measureable, and their position can be easily determined.
4- They are not alone; and it would appear that neither are we. There are several objects that appear simultaneously which have also been there since
the first satellite images were taken by the telescopes in question.
1- The first instance of these objects was recorded on the very first image taken by StereoA&B on January 29, 2007.
jan 29, 2007
The August 16, 2013 image also shows these objects. They have been there for at least as long as we've looked and are still there now.
25 day time-lapse
2- These objects have been visible since 2007, but nothing has been said publicly by NASA officials. Many available images have been deleted from the
public data base, had parts hidden with black rectangles, or renamed such that they could not be found.
It can be shown that NASA did some gymnastics with their equipment in order to verify that these objects were not an anomaly caused by lens defects,
interference patterns, etc. In the space of 27 hrs, the image was seen to rotate 360 degrees in regular intervals. I called NASA's representative for
the Stereo project (Joseph B. Gurman) to get an explanation but my call was not returned.
3- As a solar flare can be seen to move OVER the main object, the object is measureable, and due to the fact that there are two satellites, can also
be triangulated and positioned in space.
4- There are several objects which can be clearly seen (at least 7,) and some images give rise to the supposition that there might be many more than
even that. Dozens... hundreds... more?
I will post more detailed information very soon as I have kept all the uncropped screenshots which show the times, dates, and satellite data relevant
to reproducing these results. These .gifs were also made to be uncluttered which is why I cropped out this original data.
Stay tuned for updates; I'm working on other .gifs... and any debunking, comments, or questions will be greatly