Amazing Moon Structures. Your expert opinions are invited!

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:22 PM
link   
I've had these pics stored for quite a while and thought it would be a good time to get some opinions on them.
They are all captured from Google Moon and to the best of my reasoning, they certainly don't appear to be natural formations.

What's the consensus ATS members?
Are they massive satellite type structures? Unusual buildings? or are they completely natural formations?

The Satellites
Area 1 pic 1 - massive satellites?


Area 1 pic 2 - zoomed in


Area 1 pic 3 - zoomed out to show better location


Area 1 pic 4 - zoomed out further


Area 1 pic 5 - Furtherest zoom - location is top centre


I then began searching other areas of the map and found this.

Buildings
Area 2 pic 1 - collection of buildings??


Area 2 pic 2 - zoomed in


Area 2 pic 3 - closest zoom


Area 2 pic 4 - zoomed out


Area 2 pic 5 - zoomed out further - structure at middle centre of image


Area 2 pic 6 - furtherest zoom to show location


Building
I'm not sure what to make of the next one - some type of pointed building?

Area 3 pic 1 -


Area 3 pic 2 - zoomed in


The ship
Does this look like some kind of shuttle or ship?

Area 4 pic 1 -


Area 4 pic 2 - zoomed out - bottom middle of screen


Area 4 pic 3 - another zoom level


So there you have it ATS's. What are your opinions?

When you look at the map scale, it certainly appears that these structures are absolutely massive. Though I do suppose that building in a lighter gravity environment would allow such constructions to be built easier than say on the earth.




posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:27 PM
link   
All i see are rocks and craters....



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:33 PM
link   
Of course they are all natural "structures". The moon is the most explored and studied heavenly body. Every inch has been examined. There is nothing artificial on the moon. At least, not so visible that somebody looking at Google would find



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by aoxomoxoa
 


Yeah I get that. If there are real structures on the moon, I would also expect them to be so heavily airbrushed that the public pictures would never show anything.

All I can say is that to me, these pictures tend to highlight something that does not appear to look normal. They appear out of place given their shapes, lighting and the shadows they cast.

Who knows.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by crazyewok
 

Same here. Rocks and shadows in craters.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by TH3S33K3R
 





Yeah I get that. If there are real structures on the moon, I would also expect them to be so heavily airbrushed that the public pictures would never show anything.


Anyone with a decent telescope and camera can get fairly detailed photographs of the moon......who exactly is going to be airbrushing all those photo's?



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 06:55 PM
link   
Cool pics, but unfortunately, I have to agree with those that have said "Rocks and Craters", that's all I see here.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


Seeing as there are plenty of crazys on here that think there is a breathbke atmosphere on the moon this is rather tame



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Argyll
 


When I hear ex Nasa employees saying their job was to airbrush photos that aren't meant for public viewing, then my answer is whoever is taking these pictures and giving them to google.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Argyll
 


Do you know of anyone who is not government or military affiliated, ie an amateur or private type of person with a scope capable of taking images at the same level of detail on the moon?
I'd love to see some pics if u do.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:54 PM
link   
I have to go with the general consensus here; nothing that can't be explained by natural phenomenon. That doesn't mean there's nothing to the images, just that THESE images are not conclusive. I would hold on to the lunar co-ordinates and try to find other images of the same sites, perhaps in IR or UV, or even an oblique view. In my experience, one image/angle/wavelength etc. is just not enough information upon which to base a good conclusion.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by TH3S33K3R
reply to post by Argyll
 


Do you know of anyone who is not government or military affiliated, ie an amateur or private type of person with a scope capable of taking images at the same level of detail on the moon?
I'd love to see some pics if u do.



That ain't gonna do you any good if you are trying to take pictures of the back side of the moon.




We all know that the Earth rotates on its own axis, so theoretically, the Moon should also do the same, allowing us to get a full picture of the planetoid. Why are we limited to seeing only 50 percent? It turns out that the speed at which the Moon rotates has led to this particular phenomenon. Millions of years ago, the Moon spun at a much faster pace than it does now. However, the gravitational influence of the Earth has gradually acted upon the Moon to slow its rotation down, in the same way that the much smaller gravitational influence of the Moon acts upon the Earth to create tides. This influence slowed the rotational period of the Moon to match that of its orbit – about 29.5 days – and it is now "locked in" to this period.


www.moonconnection.com...

convenient..............


Now all that being said, rocks.
edit on 18-8-2013 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:59 PM
link   
Sink holes or old lava bubbles, maybe craters from debris strikes.
Nothing that I can see makes me think constructed structures



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 07:59 PM
link   
Light and shadows in high contrast. One notable shadow is of something higher than the ground floor, but not specifically anomalous. Most of the rest are shadows inside craters, again not specifically anomalous.



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 08:19 PM
link   
reply to post by TH3S33K3R
 
I see your moon pics and raise you a moon pic...



posted on Aug, 18 2013 @ 08:22 PM
link   
some of those round shapes look likr they are NOT part of the ground....they look like they are in the air above it.....



posted on Aug, 19 2013 @ 11:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by aoxomoxoa
Of course they are all natural "structures". The moon is the most explored and studied heavenly body. Every inch has been examined. There is nothing artificial on the moon. At least, not so visible that somebody looking at Google would find


Well, first we are assuming they actually went to the moon, lol. There is a lot of people who believe we never went to the moon with manned missions. For me the biggest of which was going through the radiation belt, their answer was the engine shielded them. Which is a crock, it was made of the lightest material they could make, and we know the only way it could even come close to shielding them would be if it were solid lead.

Now let's say they did get there, the actual area of the surface they explored is less than four football fields. In the kind of equipment they were in they could have missed something the feet away from them.

What about the dark side? There could be a great many structures there.

I give you props for finding the shapes and sparking a new debate, lol. Great fun, gotta luv it.

The Bot



posted on Aug, 19 2013 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by TH3S33K3R
 


I don't want to be sarcastic, or dismissive, but its hard! sooo hard! I'm biting my lip..I'm holding out...
Oh damn it! just cant hold out any longerrrrrrrr.

I see nothing here that says structures built by any sort of intelligence, cept maybe an anthill, but no ants, ok.
on the other hand it could be a building site that apprentice aliens use to learn their pyramid building skills.. sort of sandbox...

No really I see only rocks, craters, crisp bag and chocolate wrapper...



posted on Aug, 19 2013 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I believe John Lear touched the subject. If one is to research anomalies on the moon the source should be from negatives. Retouching a negative is tricky. Not impossible but really really tricky.



posted on Aug, 19 2013 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Rosinitiate
 


Lol no thats true.
Are you suggesting that's where the real structures are Rosinitiate?





new topics
top topics
 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join