It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
The second factor that comes into play is scalability, if the reactor can be scaled to say a size it can work in a car, I can see some people having a really bad day.
Professor Brian Cox takes a global journey in search of the energy source of the future. Called nuclear fusion, it is the process that fuels the sun and every other star in the universe. Yet despite over five decades of effort, scientists have been unable to get even a single watt of fusion electricity onto the grid. Brian returns to Horizon to find out why.
Granted extraordinary access to the biggest and most ambitious fusion experiments on the planet, Brian travels to the USA to see a high security fusion bomb testing facility in action and is given a tour of the world’s most powerful laser.
In South Korea, he clambers inside the reaction chamber of K-Star, the world’s first super-cooled, super-conducting fusion reactor where the fate of future fusion research will be decided. Nuclear fusion is nature’s power source. From the Sun to the most distant stars, the energy that lights up the Universe is released by sticking hydrogen nuclei together to make helium. Since hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe, it seems sensible to ask whether we might endeavor to do the same and power ourselves out of our serious energy crisis by building stars on Earth. The problem of course is that stars are big and hot; the Sun is the size of a million Earths, and burns six hundred million tonnes of hydrogen fuel every second.
reply to post by Pilgrum
As long as we have machines with moving parts there'll be a need for lubricants so oil will never go out of fashion and consider all the uses for crude oil apart from fuel and lubrication
reply to post by UmbraSumus
I tracked down an excellent BBC documentary which would compliment your O.P It was once on Youtube and some other documentary sites but has since been removed. I manged to find it on Blip-TV.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
Thank you very much for this contribution to the OP. I really appreciate the effort you made to find this. Star(and 10 more if I could).
reply to post by Pilgrum
I do think outside the box, but not so far outside that I can't even see the box any more and hover cars with no lubrication needs are somewhat over the horizon in terms of current real technology.
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
_____
What do you believe would happen if we perfected a FUSION reactor for energy?
Its a great question. No doubt, it would have utterly immense implications for all facets of life.
But a key consideration would be who will benefit most. I don`t imagine that the blue prints will be posted online. It is conceivable that the technology will be licenced. Those countries not involved early in its development may not benefit as much as others. It may be this bottle-neck that is utilitised by nations to gain an edge.
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
This is key which is why I suggested earlier that if it is a Western Nation that develops it, the tech will probably spread fairly quickly. particularly in South America and possibly several key nations in Africa. Historically the western powers are quick to teach and give power generation tech to developing countries in the hopes of creating stability.
reply to post by Brother Stormhammer
Based on recent trends, right behind the construction crews will come the Minions waving their usual array of "Nuclear Doomsday" signs, protesting to protect our water and predicting mayhem...
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
There is no risk of a meltdown, and should the process shut off, it would quickly cool down. In addition, the particles used have relatively short half lives, versus fission reactors, making disposal much easier, and much more practical.
28 Countries signed an agreement to work on an energy source for the future. EFDA provides the framework, JET is the shared experiment, Fusion energy is the goal
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
It should not take long to educate the nuclear doomsday people to the safety of a fusion reactor. There is no risk of a meltdown, and should the process shut off, it would quickly cool down. In addition, the particles used have relatively short half lives, versus fission reactors, making disposal much easier, and much more practical.
I really, really hope you're correct about the education delay...what makes me pessimistic is that even after 60+ years of explaining things, a stunning number of people still think that nuclear fission plants = nuclear warheads that might detonate at any minute. Given the overall panic reaction when 'fission' is mentioned, good luck convincing people that 'fusion' doesn't mean that PG$&E or the Salt River Project isn't trying to park Tsar Bomba in their back yard..
---p.5 All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue. Who will be the beneficiary?
In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice.
Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war agains the American public with the ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible and worthy few....
---p.17 Since most of the general public will not excercise restraint (AND THEY PREY TELL, ARE DOING THAT THEMSELVES....OR SHOULD NOT THE ENERGY COME OUT AND ABUNDANCE/FREEDOM. MY 2 Cents added!), there are only two alternatives to reduce the economic inductance of the system:
1. Let the populace bludgeon each other to death in a war, which will only result in a total destruction of the living earth. (Gee what are “they” doing to the living earth and its oceans???/)
2. Take control of the world by the use of economic “silent weapons” in a form of “quiet warfare” and reduce the economic inductance of the world to a safe elvel by a proces of benevolent slavery and genocide.
reply to post by Unity_99
It's already been done. This info would never be out in any portion, if TPTB's scientists, long ago, from Keely, Tesla's days on, didn't have all this stuff under their belt. Anything you can conceive they have already researched and conceived and anyone who thinks otherwise is not thinking straight and doesnt understand the Power Grabbers at the top.