It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(abridged quote for space)
Over the past several months, “virtual currencies" have received increasing attention from law enforcement, the business community, the financial sector, and the federal government. . . . . . They can be sent nearly anonymously, leaving little or no trail for regulators or enforcement agencies.
(abridged quote for space)
Last month, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a Texas man with running a virtual currency Ponzi scheme through which he raised about $60 million worth of Bítcoin . . . . . The defendant in the case argued that the Court had no jurisdiction, since Bitcoin is not money and not part of anything regulated by the United States. The Court, however, concluded that Bitcoin is a currency or form of money.
Given that virtual currencies appear to be an important emerging area, pursuant to its authority under Rule XXVUO of the Standing Rules of the Senate, Section 101 of Senate Resolution 445 (108th Congress), and Section 12(0) of Senate Resolution 64 (113th Congress), the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has initiated an inquiry into virtual currencies. As part of that inquiry, our Committee staff has been interviewing individuals inside and outside of government regarding the threats and risks related to virtual currency - and also the promise it holds in some areas.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Well, when something starts to become as good as the real thing, expect to be treated like it would be the message here, I'd say. These are just parts of the overall letter and it's worth reading the whole thing. It shows pretty clearly that they do take this seriously as a new market/currency to both regulate and manipulate. The shadowy existence couldn't last forever.