It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by xuenchen
So, the State Department donates 40 million to Libya in thier
quest for SAMs. Whats 400 when you have 20,000?
And now supposedly Al Qaeda has them!
I guess this means that Al Qaeda is not defeated then.
Originally posted by SPECULUM
already knew about the missiles missing in libia..right after they killed Gaddafi..they made sure we knew about it so it was easier to sell for positive public opinion when the CIA uses them on unsuspecting countries airliners in the name of Al quaeda
Exclusive: Al Qaeda Conference Call
Originally posted by liveandlearn
This needs a bit more credit than it is being given. Here is a little more on DiGinova and his partner/wife Victoria Toensing
Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova said today that the State Department is denying clearances to attorneys who want to represent Benghazi whistleblowers - even though one of the attorneys already has a current Top Secret security clearance.
"The Department of State is refusing to grant clearances to Victoria and other people who want to represent the whistleblowers in an attempt to prevent the testimony," DiGenova, founding partner of the Washington, D.C. law firm of diGenova & Toensing, LLP, charged in an interview on Washington DC's WMAL radio.
Rep. Darryl Issa (R-) is demanding Sec. of State John Kerry grant clearances to attorneys like his partner, Victoria Toensing, who has an active Top Secret security clearance:
"Victoria Toensing, my partner, has just been retained by one of the Department of State whistleblowers who are going to appear before the Issa committee. On April 26, Congressman Issa sent a letter to the new Sec of State, John Kerry, demanding that the lawyers who are going to represent the whistleblowers be cleared - be given clearances - so they can talk to their clients and the committee about classified information."f
At the same time the theory that the closing of the embassies in the mid east was because of the missing missiles doesn't make sense. We announced we were moving embassy officials out of the area and then flew them out. A perfect target. It is unlikely they have gotten all missiles out of the country so seems some would be available to hit their target.
My logic may be a little flawed here....just thinking.