I have over the months encountered many news articles relating to the next US presidential election in 2016.
My diatribe, however, begins here. Even since the late 1970's, George H.W. Bush was in charge of the CIA (though for a short stint) and the Vice
President under Ronald Reagan during his entire presidency, which spanned the decade. He of course had many other affiliations, and many know of his
father Prescott Bush's involvement in both Skull & Bones at Yale plus the financing of oil resources to both sides of WW2.
After HW Bush lost the Presidency to Bill Clinton, Clinton served 2 terms, until 2001.
Then W Bush took over from 2001 to 2009.
Now Obama is in office until the foreseeable future, at least 2016. There have been articles speaking about how he may even seek a third term (ala
FDR) should some uncontrollable national crisis hit (though I do not necessarily support these ideas the idea remains prevalent in some circles of
So, here we are, approaching 2016.
And we are left with these power players:
1. Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State and loser to Obama in the 2008 campaigns, who has dropped off the map in order to eventually resurface
as it would seem. Our friends in the MSM keep us aware of this here and there in the present. There is a great certainty, especially both with the
Democratic Party ensuring its plebeian constituency of its endless welfare and her vaulted national 'put-me-on-a-pedestal' status that won't make her
a player. And I could keep going about her, to speak of the Rose Law Firm (IF YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT ROSE LAW YOU MUST RESEARCH IT!!!) and the
circumstances around Vince Foster's death (with whom she purportedly had an affair) but..
2. Jeb Bush. I don't see how he could ever become President as the country should be Bush-weary (though many southern Republicans are aligned to the
Bushes' Christian doctrine and war-readiness) but the threat remains. He keeps popping up in the MSM, maybe because he is a part of the elite American
royalty that we genuflect to but still. This guy is nothing more than another arm of a political machine that needs to be taken as seriously as the
gum I just pried from my shoe - I'm glad to be done with it.
3. Michelle Obama. Yes, there is a circle of true believers that Michelle Obama should run for President. Most of this enthusiasm will probably rest
in the next 3 years and I would more expect her to resurface of nature in the elections of 2024, should Clinton win the Presidency in 2016 and be
re-elected. Obama has a grip on the hearts of single moms and people 'trying to make their children have better lives' by giving them malnourished GM
food in school meals. Honestly, when I was a kid, I needed 2 school meals to fill me up and I am in no means a real big guy but at least my food had
some value back then.
....I would continue to list the other players in this election, from Chris Christie to Rand Paul to Marco Rubio to Joe Biden (yes he may try!) to
Rick Santorum to Claire McCaskill to whomever.. the list doesnt matter.
THE POINT I am trying to make is this:
Should we have another Bush or Clinton or Obama in the White House (imagine this!):
Bush: VP 1981-89, President 89-93,
Clinton, President 93-2001
Bush, President 01-09
Obama, President 09-17
Clinton* (speculative) 17-25
Obama* (speculative) 25-33?
We seem to be used to electing Presidents for 2 terms, at least over the past few decades. This scenario would ALLOW THE ENTIRE EXECUTIVE BRANCH TO BE
CONTROLLED BY 3 FAMILIES FOR OVER 50 YEARS!
We need someone else in office. I am a fan of Ron Paul but Rand scares me a bit, I think he may be in on it. There are a lot of great 3rd party
candidates. Let this thread begin a discourse if possible.
Who would you prefer in the hot seat of Commander in Chief?
Where does this madness end? Especially when there is no honesty or integrity in any politician today.
What can we do to ensure the end mass vote manipulation?
Are you sick of it or what?
edit on 11-8-2013 by andboycott because: (no reason given)