It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He is not clearly talking about the Korean War
Major General Stubblebine states he saw a missile in the footage he was presented.
I do not know what footage he saw. Neither do you
Plus, you have no proof the footage presented in support of a plane strike has not been altered prior to presentation.
But there was no bunker buster missile there,
Bunker busters dont have such a massive fireball and black smoke
Actually he clearly is...
And the next time he saw it he saw a plane.... obviously they altered the footage
Well there are only two videos of the impact in the pubic domain and neither of them show a missile.
Yes but there is no proof that it was actually altered in any way in the first place.... trying to prove a negative is rather tricky
Originally posted by totallackey
But the objective in question is to PROVE what caused the damage at the Pentagon. It is not an objective to prove a negative.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by totallackey
But the objective in question is to PROVE what caused the damage at the Pentagon. It is not an objective to prove a negative.
And it has been proven. Beyond all doubt. You just cannot accept the facts or the truth.
I wonder if you believethat in reality Truman was defeated by Dewey:
Originally posted by theRhenn
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by totallackey
But the objective in question is to PROVE what caused the damage at the Pentagon. It is not an objective to prove a negative.
And it has been proven. Beyond all doubt. You just cannot accept the facts or the truth.
I wonder if you believethat in reality Truman was defeated by Dewey:
Show me the proof. I have failed to see any "proof". For every one you think you can show, I can PROOVE to you have that there is counter "proof".
edit on 11-8-2013 by theRhenn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by theRhenn
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by totallackey
But the objective in question is to PROVE what caused the damage at the Pentagon. It is not an objective to prove a negative.
And it has been proven. Beyond all doubt. You just cannot accept the facts or the truth.
I wonder if you believethat in reality Truman was defeated by Dewey:
Show me the proof. I have failed to see any "proof". For every one you think you can show, I can PROOVE to you have that there is counter "proof".
edit on 11-8-2013 by theRhenn because: (no reason given)
Ok, I posted this link earlier and no-one has responded to it. Why were Arlington police in a real time recording from 9/11 calling in a plane crash and specifically ( at 0.32 ) an " American Airlines plane " ?
www.youtube.com...
What is your counter proof ?