It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MuzzleBreak
"To understand who rules you, determine who you are not allowed to criticize."
Consider who the MSM proposes to be evil incarnate or whose works are too vile to be discussed. Then read those things.
Auricom
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
This topic isn't about the Holocaust, so I'll refrain from discussing it. Plus, my lack of knowledge on the subject outside of what I learned in school wouldn't help to add anything valuable to the discussion. Besides, being a believer in the Holocaust I wouldn't be much of a debater regarding it.
I will say this though: History is written by the victors. It always has been and always will be and proof going against the popular belief will naturally be ridiculed because it comes from a source that is so demonized that no one can take it seriously. It's all done by design. (I'm not implicating Jew's or anyone else on this, just that naturally after wars the other side is typically demonized by the victors.)
This will be my last response in this thread. Thanks for allowing me to take part.
AngryCymraeg
MuzzleBreak
"To understand who rules you, determine who you are not allowed to criticize."
Consider who the MSM proposes to be evil incarnate or whose works are too vile to be discussed. Then read those things.
The Protocols are still a forgery however.
MuzzleBreak
AngryCymraeg
MuzzleBreak
"To understand who rules you, determine who you are not allowed to criticize."
Consider who the MSM proposes to be evil incarnate or whose works are too vile to be discussed. Then read those things.
The Protocols are still a forgery however.
If you only use Zionist connected sources, that is the conclusion you will always reach.
AngryCymraeg
I'm sorry but what on earth are you talking about? Have you even bothered to research this?
AngryCymraeg
MuzzleBreak
"To understand who rules you, determine who you are not allowed to criticize."
Consider who the MSM proposes to be evil incarnate or whose works are too vile to be discussed. Then read those things.
The Protocols are still a forgery however.
buster2010
AngryCymraeg
MuzzleBreak
"To understand who rules you, determine who you are not allowed to criticize."
Consider who the MSM proposes to be evil incarnate or whose works are too vile to be discussed. Then read those things.
The Protocols are still a forgery however.
And the author must have been physic because the amount of things that were written in it that has come true is amazing.
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by Auricom
I can see your point and I respect it. However, I have to say that I disagree with it. The Holocaust is a tremendously emotive subject and we have a massive amount of evidence that it happened. Those that deny that it happened deny that evidence even exists - or that it's lies or that there was some marginal tattered piece of justification for it.
There are many Holocaust historians, such as Deborah Lipstadt, who refuse to debate Holocaust deniers because that would grant the latter some degree of credibility. I can very much see their point. Holocaust deniers, to me, have no credibility. And they are dangerous. Because denying the Holocaust is to rewrite history.
hellobruce
AngryCymraeg
I'm sorry but what on earth are you talking about? Have you even bothered to research this?
His "researched" them in the stormfront forum, where they claim that they are genuine!edit on 29-9-2013 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)
MuzzleBreak
The preface and Intro to this translation are informative:
www.biblebelievers.org.au...
AngryCymraeg
reply to post by Auricom
I can see your point and I respect it. However, I have to say that I disagree with it. The Holocaust is a tremendously emotive subject and we have a massive amount of evidence that it happened. Those that deny that it happened deny that evidence even exists - or that it's lies or that there was some marginal tattered piece of justification for it.
There are many Holocaust historians, such as Deborah Lipstadt, who refuse to debate Holocaust deniers because that would grant the latter some degree of credibility. I can very much see their point. Holocaust deniers, to me, have no credibility. And they are dangerous. Because denying the Holocaust is to rewrite history.