It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Tells Schools Not To Discipline Black Students For Bad Behavior

page: 27
79
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 09:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by spirited75
as AA students are allowed to behave more obnoxiously in school with no consequences, the level of learning will drop to the level of the lowest common denominator and all colors of children will become as stupid as the stupidest kid allowed in the class. water seeks its own level.

we waste too much money on uneducable children as it is and should be spending more money on the gifted and smart kids.



Ummm... two things.

(1). This EO doesn't give AA students a pass to "behave more obnoxiously in school with no consequences."
Really, it doesn't. Have a read and educate yourself. The OP is grossly misinformed.

(2). Your comment,

"we waste too much money on uneducable children as it is and should be spending more money on the gifted and smart kids"

sounds an awful lot like you're saying that AA students are incapable of being educated.

So... you may want to rephrase that. That's just an FYI2U.





edit on 11-8-2013 by Garkiniss because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


That's just a tad delusional. Democrats used to be Right Wing (sort of still are) and Republicans used to be Left-Wing.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


Sure it will. This brings out a whole NEW bias and just causes more/new racial tension by singling out 1 race of people.. You don't see that, really?
edit on 11-8-2013 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


The singling out already exists, hence the EO. Can't you see that?



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 09:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


Nope, all I see is more racism brought to us by our POTUS. It's really pathetic, and it's the kind of thing that is tearing our nation apart. This does nothing but single AA's out. You and many others apparently can't see it when it's staring you right in the face.
edit on 11-8-2013 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:07 PM
link   
Shiva shiva. This is pretty bad news. Can never see the benefits of any sort of segregation, whether apparently good or bad. Just seems to loose all sense of equality and reminds people that we should be seen as different according to ethnicity or other.

I've seen similar (but not the same) happenings over here where people from certain ethnic backgrounds are favoured for jobs/houses etc so companies can improve their 'equality' quotas. Stinks of absurdity to me.

I can't imagine any sort of segregation not causing conflict. Maybe ol' charlie manson was onto something with his prophecies... probably not, but stuff such as this is very worrying. We stuck in a evolutionary timewarp or something?



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


Nope, all I see is more racism brought to us by our POTUS. It's really pathetic, and it's the kind of thing that is tearing out nation apart. This does nothing but single AA's out. You and many others apparently can't see it when it's staring you right in the face.


You're right.

You see a black President trying to get equal treatment for black students as an open act of racism.

I see an EO designed to give already unfairly punished and persecuted AA kids the same chance at success that Caucasian American kids have.

It's only "tearing this nation apart" because people like you are so upset about it.

If you're so certain this is some sinister tactic by the President to create civil discord, then why are you so upset about it? That would be like a mouse staring at a mouse trap and thinking, "Screw it. I LOVE CHEESE!!!"



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


That's just a tad delusional. Democrats used to be Right Wing (sort of still are) and Republicans used to be Left-Wing.


No.

What's delusional is this myth of the magical switching party routine...



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


"Equal treatment", Right. Keep on living in your false 1950's fake reality bud. Keep on advocating "Special treatment" for specific groups and see where it gets us. I think we're at an impasse now, and I will strongly agree to disagree. Peace.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by ButterCookie

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


That's just a tad delusional. Democrats used to be Right Wing (sort of still are) and Republicans used to be Left-Wing.


No.

What's delusional is this myth of the magical switching party routine...


It's not a myth. Why don't you visit a Klan rally and ask them who they voted for in the last election, or the election before that, or the one before that? I think you'd get a wake up call.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


"Equal treatment", Right. Keep on living in your false 1950's fake reality bud. Keep on advocating "Special treatment" for specific groups and see where it gets us. I think we're at an impasse now, and I will strongly agree to disagree. Peace.


You show me the sentence in the EO that calls for "special treatment" and I'll happily shut up. Until then...



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:23 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Or what most other people call history.
Read all about it.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


I wonder how the Parents of these Afro American kids feel about the presidents stance on this issue . First and formost , Discipline of children begins at Home , not in the Schools . Considering the disparity of the Afro American population currenty in prisons all across this country compared to other ethnic groups , you would think the presidents utterances would be more on the line of emphisising more Discipline for those who would think about running afoul of the Law and getting in trouble . I guess this is yet another Foot in your Mouth moment from our pretender In Chief..........



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:34 PM
link   
You wanted to see who the KKK endorses?


Tom Metzger

Who: Director, White Aryan Resistance

Likes: White people, karaoke, environmentalists

Dislikes: Race-mixing, Jews, the federal government, capitalism

Career Highlights: Was Grand Dragon of Ku Klux Klan in the 70s; won the Democratic primary during his bid for Congress in 1980; appeared on the episode of Geraldo Rivera’s show in 1988 when Rivera’s nose was broken in a brawl.

"The corporations are running things now, so it’s not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He’s a warmonger. He’s a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush. Obama, according to his book, Dreams Of My Father, is a racist and I have no problem with black racists. I’ve got the quote right here: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s white race.' The problem with Obama is he’s being dishonest about his racial views. I’d respect him if he’d just come out and say, 'Yeah, I’m a black racist.' I don’t hate black people. I just think it’s in the best interest of the races to be separated as much as possible. See, I’m a leftist. I’m not a rightist. I hate the transnational corporations far more than any black person."


Erich Gliebe

Who: Chairman, National Alliance

Likes: Third Reich, the movie Rocky

Dislikes: Integration, Jewish-controlled media

Career Highlights: Turning white-power record label, Resistance Records, into a million-dollar-a-year business juggernaut; an 8-0 record as a professional boxer under the nickname, "The Aryan Barbarian."

"Obama might be a better candidate for our cause because he’s racially conscious. One of our big things in the National Alliance is to raise the racial consciousness of our people. Young whites in universities, they’ve been stripped of any kind of racial identity. Obama may be a racist in a positive sense for his people--that will awaken a lot of the whites, knock some sense into them. They’ll see that non-white Americans are allowed to be proud of who they are, to be racially conscious, to talk about their people or their community without being attacked as being racist. Let’s face it, white people aren’t going to fight for their causes, for their kind with a white president. I don’t think McCain even acknowledges that a white race exists. He’s all about granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The fact he wants to keep us in wars in the Middle East for 100 years, that’s not a good thing. I give Obama credit, he seems to have stuck to his guns as far as pulling the troops out of Iraq. He’s a very intelligent man, an excellent speaker and has charisma. John McCain offers none of that. Perhaps the best thing for the white race is to have a black president. My only problem with Obama is perhaps he’s not black enough."

Rocky Suhayda

Who: Chairman, American Nazi Party

Likes: Hitler, white people

Dislikes: Jews, immigrants, multinational corporations

Career highlights: Being widely quoted bemoaning in the fact that so few Aryan-Americans had the cojones of the 9/11 hijackers: "If we were one-tenth as serious, we might start getting somewhere."

"White people are faced with either a negro or a total nutter who happens to have a pale face. Personally I’d prefer the negro. National Socialists are not mindless haters. Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for Judeo-capitalist exploitation, who supports the invasion of America by illegals--basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women--when usually negroes who have 'made it' immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize--that’s the kind of negro that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it’s good for all racially minded folks. Besides, America cares nothing for the interests of the white American worker, while having a love affair with just about every non-white on planet Earth. It’d be poetic justice to have a non-white as titular chief over this decaying modern Sodom and Gomorrah."

and then there's this:

Klan endorses Obama


edit on 11-8-2013 by ButterCookie because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Yeah, but they're only endorsing his "white half."


Barack Obama, is half white, and it is this half that we endorse...



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Garkiniss
 


The "special treatment" is to make "equal" (as you say) punishments for blacks, but there is nothing anywhere in this age to indicate punishments on blacks are UN-equal to begin with. You share the belief that it is, I do not. You think the problem is skin color, I do NOT. If blacks are being punished harsher and there are solid numbers to suggest this, then what you are saying is that the problem is, that ALL schools are racist against blacks, which is a load of nonsense and you and I both know it. Because this issue doesn't exist in the first place like you say, THAT is what makes this EO racist. Otherwise, you might have a point, like say, if we lived in the 50s.

Have you ever thought that if more blacks are being suspended, maybe they are acting out more than others because of other very underlying issues? Does EVERYthing have to do with racism?

It's also statistically proven that blacks commit more crime than whites, why is that? Is that because everyone is racist, or is it because the lifestyle and personal choice the "black community" has chosen to live? There is an underlying problem indeed, but it has more to do with poverty and culture those kids are raised in than it does the color of ones skin. Blacks are not the only group that have problems in school, it's ALL across the board of races. And ALL of them are deeper issues than simply the color of their skin.

Get it? If not, then I truly have nothing else to offer you.
edit on 11-8-2013 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Yeah, but they're only endorsing his "white half."


Barack Obama, is half white, and it is this half that we endorse...




If the "white" was the part that they were only concerned about, then why not just endorse Romney??

Because it is the platform of the DEMOCRATIC party that they align with.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


Wookiep you made VERY VALID points..

I mentioned them too; inner city black students are going to come with more dysfunctional upbringing than whites. That's not racist, that's the TRUTH.

They seriously think that it is still 1954....seriously.

Please post a screenshot of a calendar for them.
edit on 11-8-2013 by ButterCookie because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


You don't get that they thought that Obama would push for a separation of the races from your quotes? I wonder about your reading comprehension. That's why they endorsed him. Looks like everyone that voted for Obama for their various reasons was let down...


That 1st dude let down in two ways, Obama didn't try to propel black people into the privileged class and he's a corporatist. Karma's a bitch.



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Hey, that's their own words from the article.

Are you saying they were lying, that's not what they really meant?



posted on Aug, 11 2013 @ 11:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Hey, that's their own words from the article.

Are you saying they were lying, that's not what they really meant?


I'm saying that they ALSO endorse Obama for the party affiliation....it 'helps' that he is half-white.



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join