Monsanto and Big Food Pull Out the Big Guns

Originally posted by Superhans

Originally posted by Hollie

Originally posted by Superhans

Originally posted by Hollie

Originally posted by Superhans

Originally posted by Hollie

Originally posted by Superhans
You are right, i am wrong. Everything i have said is wrong.

I agree!

GREAT!!!!
i don't want you to respond to this message.

Too late

.

lol, okay. Once again i am wrong and you are so correct.

Yes, we already established this.

I know!!!
Its funny because you are so dumb that i had to go down to this level just for you. You are still right and i am wrong but wow... I really hope you don't have any kids that respect anything you say

Wait... what... I thought the high and mighty Superhans was above personal attacks and stated that it means "your argument is invalid"... what a hypocrite...

Originally posted by TheEthicalSkeptic

Originally posted by Superhans
That is a stretch. The "you are a paid shill" response really just means
"You are correct and i cannot back up anything what i say with proof or simple logic.

Nobody said you were a paid shill. We said that you were an amateur shill.

No the industry has already announced an activism budget for internet shill activity. They have made this clear, that it is one of the campaign goals.

edit on 8-8-2013 by TheEthicalSkeptic because: (no reason given)

Not meaning to correct you because pretty much everything you've said is spot on... but... I called him a paid shill... it was back a couple pages and there's no need to read back through at the idiocy to find it...

reply to post by SloAnPainful


Oh, yes very true.

Other nations aren't as willing to play corporate water boy as our government is

Monsanto
Is The Government

Originally posted by AlphaHawk
reply to post by Sk8ergrl

 

Do you think 1052 people properly represent an entire nation?

If it's good enough for the MSM to report on gun control/abortion/religion/etc... sure... why not...

Double edged swords cut both ways... and I have yet to meet anyone ever that will say face to face that they don't want to know what's in the food they're eating... can't say the same about the rest of the topic polls are skewed to show representing the "American public"...

What I learned from this and other threats on GMO is that GMO causes some people to be Supertrolls.

reply to post by Siddharta


Yep there is at least one in every thread. Some people just suffer OTD (Obsessive Trolling Disorder).

-SAP-

reply to post by SwissMarked


So you're happy to stoop to MSM standards then?

I guess I'm not surprised, anything goes as long as it confirms ones beliefs.

Originally posted by AlphaHawk
anything goes as long as it confirms ones beliefs.

It sure works for the GMO supporters!
They are spouting the most ignorant diatribe seen in a long while

There is a group of giant chemical companies spending millions every year
just so they can keep the pubic in the dark as to the reals dangers of GMO....

They are so scared of the public having knowledge, as they need someone
to buy that crap. As it has been pointed out, the rulers dont eat GMO, they serve organic!

reply to post by burntheships


So, can you or anyone else that is claiming that this new Q&A site is actually keeping people in the dark?

Another thread was started about this site claiming it was spreading disinformation

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I asked in that thread if they could point out what specifically was disinformation.

It fell on deaf ears.

So perhaps you can do better?

They managed to successfully quash the last attempt to put labels on food that it contains GMO products, during a national referendum just last November.

Now, people are realizing that maybe this was a good idea and they shouldn't have voted "No" to putting GMO labels on food.

Monsanto will ramp up the fear tactics, about how it will drive up food costs etc. to put a simple sticker on food. which of course is ridiculous.

reply to post by AlphaHawk


Agian, you make the point that any article that serves to educate the public,
any study done that shows dangers to human health from allowing GMO
(transgenic crops) will simply be labeled "anti" gmo as if that is all there
is to it.

Scientific studies are not opinon. But let Monsanto and these other giant
chemical companies start a disinformation campaign and its to be
assumed they are going to speak any truth? That is just absurd.

Anytime there's a GMO bill in the works, you know Monsanto and all of its shills will be in the wake to launch a multi-million dollar lobbying and propaganda campaign to stifle it.

You'd think if they were so worried about cost or lost revenue, they'd stop pumping millions of dollars into campaigns that won't do a damn thing except keep things the same as they are now. They're not spending money to help things progress, they're spending money to stop it in its tracks.

S&F Keep spreading the message.

reply to post by burntheships


Don't call it disinformation if you can't provide the evidence that what they're saying is disinformation.

I'm not going to believe you just because you say so.

I want to see a direct claim from the Q&A site and then I want to see the refuting evidence against that claim.

reply to post by AlphaHawk


I have no intention of promoting that site...that is why I specifically did not post the
site address, but rather reported on the news that Monsanto, Bayer, Dow and a few
others are now resorting to a new propaganda campaign, complete with a new propaganda website, a front group, and a slick public
relations firm to help change the "evil" image of GMO. They have hired, and are
sending out paid workers to social media to try and keep people in the dark about the truth:
the dangers of eating Genetically Modified food.

My posting history speaks for itself. Over the last few years I have become increasingly
educated on the study of the negative health affects of Genetically Modified organisms;
transgenic GMO for human consumption. I have had many members...many many ask
me to continue to bring forward scientific information when it is new and timely.

reply to post by burntheships


Oh I see, you don't want to promote their site!

Because directly refuting their claims would promote the site further wouldn't it?

Give me a break.

Don't call something disinformation if you can't prove it is disinformation, that's just pathetic and small minded.

This is the most ironic thing right here;


still no answers or comments to my question on 'that' site.

gotta luv it.

Originally posted by AlphaHawk
reply to post by burntheships

 

Oh I see, you don't want to promote their site!

I believe that would be against the T&C here, that is enough.

I certainly am free to post news here as a member, if you dont like the news,
then you are free to hit that red x up at the right hand corner.

If you are really interested in learning more about the scientific
evidence that shows the dangers of GMO, there a long list of threads
here on ATS, literally hundreds of them....and the majority of them
are not posted by me. Enjoy!

reply to post by AlphaHawk


There's loads of dis-info there.

I'll be sharing some choice material soon enough.

Most of the 'obvious' examples are in the 'comments'.

reply to post by burntheships


And your posting history does speak for itself.

If I was inclined like many here who like to parrot the phrase shill all the time, I'd call you an anti-GMO shill, paid to carry out a smear campaign so organic growers will get more sales for their overpriced "organic" foods.

Tell me THAT isn't a conspiracy?

Slap organic on it and charge more for it.

reply to post by AlphaHawk


I would quote you, but your post is against the t&c. so I am left to wait for an
intelligble response from you before I can respond, that is if you can provide one.

In the meantime, here is one of the best threads ever on ATS by our top member
Monsanto - Bayer Engineering Death: Bees, Bats and You?