It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by Arken
Multiple sources.
Two sources according to this .
Google Moon, which uses images from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter as well as Japan’s Kaguya mission.
blogs.discovermagazine.com...
Originally posted by Mianeye
reply to post by Arken
Yeah, i was really excited when i found that page back in time, took me months to go through it all, and my introduction to the guys you just mentioned, it can only be understood with a WIDE open mind, but can make you go mental if you take it to serious
Google Moon use also Lunar Orbiter Mosaic Images, as you, me and one Billion of people could see...
Hmmm... your attempt to try to debunk everything is quite souspicious.
Are you the same good old Gortex or someone else who stolen his account?
Originally posted by Arken
Your source is fake, lie or it is unfamiliar with...
....
Hmmm... your attempt to try to debunk everything is quite souspicious.
Originally posted by onebigmonkey
That particular piece of Google Moon is (I am fairly sure) composed of Lunar Orbiter 3 images of the Apollo 14 landing area - you can see the wqhite marker crosses on the image. They have used a better quality orbiter photograph than the base layer available in the Global maps of Google Moon..
The alleged structures are just artefacts of the stitching process joining a couple of these high resolution lunar orbiter images together. There are no buildings or walls.
The high resolution one showing Apollo 14's landing area is here: www.lpi.usra.edu...[/ url]
It is image h2 on number 3133 on this page [url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/mission/?3]http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/mission/?3
(tried editing the links but it still wasn't happy - copy and paste should work!)
edit on 6-8-2013 by onebigmonkey because: link erroredit on 6-8-2013 by onebigmonkey because: link problem
Thanks for the morning chuckle, the pinnacle and "shadow" that is 90 degrees off all the other shadows in the image.
Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by JimOberg
Thanks for the morning chuckle, the pinnacle and "shadow" that is 90 degrees off all the other shadows in the image.
As I said you several times Mr. JimOberg, presumed expert of something, ... your excessive self esteem is not good for you
YOU refer to this one...
Oh, the RED LINE is the frontier from each other.... of the TWO DIFFERENT IMAGES!
Thank for the continuous laughs...edit on 6-8-2013 by Arken because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by JimOberg
Thanks for the morning chuckle, the pinnacle and "shadow" that is 90 degrees off all the other shadows in the image.
As I said you several times Mr. JimOberg, presumed expert of something, ... your excessive self esteem is not good for you
YOU refer to this one...
Oh, the RED LINE is the frontier from each other.... of the TWO DIFFERENT IMAGES!
Thank for the continuous laughs...edit on 6-8-2013 by Arken because: (no reason given)
Well if taken from the LRO site only an IDIOT would not know the red line shows the border of an LRO image strip but you would know that Arken because you are not and IDIOT are you
Originally posted by arianna
Arken, From looking at your submitted images the formations do look somewhat artificial. To determine exactly what is there a certain amount of image enhancement will be required to sharpen and bring out the detail then we may be in a better position to make a more detailed visual analysis of what is really on the terrain.
For anyone who says they are rocks just rocks. Of course there are rocks on the moon but these particular 'rocks' are something completely different.
I am definitely going to be looking at this one and trying various filter's and enhancement's.
My gut feeling is that you have found something definite here and it is not a stone or rocks, now is it of terrestrial origin possibly ancient or Alien is the question.
The Lunar Orbiter orbital photographs were transmitted to Earth as analog data after onboard scanning of the original film into a series of strips. The data were written to magnetic tape and also to film. The film data were used to create hand-made mosaics of Lunar Orbiter frames. Each LO exposure resulted in two photographs: medium-resolution frames recorded by the 80-mm focal-length lens and high-resolution frames recorded by the 610-mm focal length lens. Due to their large size, HR frames were divided into three sections, or sub-frames. Large-format prints (16 x 20 inches) from the mosaics were created and several copies were distributed across the U.S. to NASA image and data libraries known as Regional Planetary Information Facilities. The resulting outstanding views were of generally very high spatial resolution and covered a substantial portion of the lunar surface, but they suffered from a “venetian blind” striping, missing or duplicated data, and frequent saturation effects that hampered their use. Nevertheless, for many years these images have been the basis of much of lunar scientific research. Because they were obtained at low to moderate Sun angles, the Lunar Orbiter photographic mosaics are particularly useful for studying the morphology of lunar topographic features.