It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vasa Croe
Originally posted by edmc^2
reply to post by Vasa Croe
You said:
Why would I need scientific instruments or terminologies when I can look at the stars and see the same ones come around each night, every night? That alone would tell me, as a critical thinker, that we are "hanging on nothing".....it would have nothing to do with a god telling me this or giving me some divine inspiration on it.....quite simple logic and reasoning for an observer of the world.
Sure! It's easy for you to say "quite simple logic and reasoning for an observer of the world".
Yet the intellectuals of the ancient times got it wrong!!!
Like the Egyptians who believed that the earth was supported by pillars; the Greeks said by Atlas; others said by an elephant standing on a turtle that swam in a cosmic sea.
It's ONLY in the 19th-20th century that it was proven beyond reasonable doubt that INDEED "the earth is hanging upon nothing" in space.
So you agree then that the Bible is accurate when it said (in poetic expression) the earth is "hanging upon nothing".
Just like what it said in Gen 1:1 of the universe having a beginning is accurate.
As for the Epic of Gilgamesh - funny that you mentioned it, it's a myth and exaggerated stories based on the Great Flood.
The history of Noah and the Great Flood on the other hand is accurate in that it mentions the date, the time, architectural specs and construction of floating vessel - the ark as well as geographical anomalies that we see today.
In any case - I need to split but I'll go into more detail when I come back later. Not much time left to type in the info.
ciao
edit on 9-8-2013 by edmc^2 because: Last min edit: epic myth and exaggeration based on the Great Flood event.
When you come back to explain, please also include the explanation of Job 9:6 and Job 38:4 which contradict the one you referenced of the Earth hanging on nothing yet are written by the same person.
Originally posted by Vasa Croe
reply to post by edmc^2
Just like the one I mentioned, which you have not responded to, with the Epic of Gilgamesh. Please explain how a story written YEARS before Jesus, God or the bible happens to have the EXACT story of the flood that the bible has in it and claims was god's work? Epic of Gilgamesh has NOTHING to do with the bible yet the bible completely and entirely plagiarizes the entire story and attributes it to god's work.
So....whomever wrote the story of the flood in the bible was either a liar or just another story teller. What I am talking about is:
Originally posted by MarsIsRed
"But if you say I'm wrong, then it will be obvious to me that you already closed you mind to incontrovertible facts as stated above. "
Someone that disagrees with you is ill?
Maybe you're ill, as in bat # crazy ill...?
Dear me... an appeal to authority must be right... coming from a bat # crazy religions nut... I think not.
Mental health problems manifest themselves in many different ways. This post proves it.
Originally posted by edmc^2
reply to post by flyingfish
First off... evolution is not a belief system
Oh yes it is!
Here... do you BELIEVE that man evolved from a lower form of organism millions of years ago?
Originally posted by peter vlar
reply to post by edmc^2
Please explain something I'm confused about. Science is wrong but you're using science to back up your story book. How do you reconcile that lack of reality and incorporate it into your world view?
Originally posted by flyingfish
Originally posted by edmc^2
reply to post by flyingfish
First off... evolution is not a belief system
Oh yes it is!
Here... do you BELIEVE that man evolved from a lower form of organism millions of years ago?
What part of my post did you not understand? My understanding of evolution has nothing to do with my beliefs.
Beliefs, do not form objective reality. That's what "objective reality" means.
It is that which exists whether we believe in it or not.
Throughout this thread and other topics, you engage in this prehistoric dance where you use pseudophilosophical wise-sounding nonsense in order to make your beliefs fit, despite your acknowledgement of arguments that clearly show that your own position is weak and dishonest at best.
Your capacity for cognitive dissonance knows few peers.
Do you BELIEVE that man evolved from a lower form of organism millions of years ago?
Originally posted by flyingfish
Do you BELIEVE that man evolved from a lower form of organism millions of years ago?
No...
Humans evolved from archaic Homo sapiens from the Middle Paleolithic, not from some lower form of organism millions of years ago.
Originally posted by flyingfish
reply to post by edmc^2
I answered your question here.
Cut the chase what's your point?
A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs. The beliefs of any such system can be classified as religious, philosophical, ideological or a combination of these.
Originally posted by flyingfish
reply to post by edmc^2
Your wrong again, I already explained to you HERE evolution is not a belief system.
You seem to have trouble understanding what a belief system is.
I will try again, here is the definition.
Belief System
A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs. The beliefs of any such system can be classified as religious, philosophical, ideological or a combination of these.
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by flyingfish
reply to post by edmc^2
Your wrong again, I already explained to you HERE evolution is not a belief system.
You seem to have trouble understanding what a belief system is.
I will try again, here is the definition.
Belief System
A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs. The beliefs of any such system can be classified as religious, philosophical, ideological or a combination of these.
OK whatever suites you.
If you don't believe your own evolution theory - so be it.
Your point is dismissed.edit on 9-8-2013 by edmc^2 because: (no reason given)
Your funny... I don't know if your serious or if your trying to be comical. I already told you "evolution is NOT something you believe in, it's something you understand". Comprende? : You Understand? And it's not my own theory to believe in..It's like asking me if I "believe" in my gravity theory
OK - let's explore this further.
Originally posted by flyingfish
OK - let's explore this further.
Let's not.
I know your trying to confuse the word "belief" as applied to evolution in science with faith, in a lame attempt to misconstrue terminology to have the same denigrating effect on evolution as the much-misunderstood word "theory".
Nice try... but your semantics are boring and predictable.
Originally posted by flyingfish
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by flyingfish
reply to post by edmc^2
Your wrong again, I already explained to you HERE evolution is not a belief system.
You seem to have trouble understanding what a belief system is.
I will try again, here is the definition.
Belief System
A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs. The beliefs of any such system can be classified as religious, philosophical, ideological or a combination of these.
OK whatever suites you.
If you don't believe your own evolution theory - so be it.
Your point is dismissed.edit on 9-8-2013 by edmc^2 because: (no reason given)
Your funny... I don't know if your serious or if your trying to be comical.
I already told you "evolution is NOT something you believe in, it's something you understand". Comprende? : You Understand?
And it's not my own theory to believe in..It's like asking me if I "believe" in my gravity theory