posted on Feb, 22 2005 @ 10:31 PM
I could argue against this dude from a conservative standpoint...
It actually wouldn't be that hard.....
Here's somethins about the last part of his email: Yes it is true that the terrorists hated us before the first U.S. soldier set foot in Iraq;
however, they did not start hating us simply for no reason. It goes back much farther than Bush. For decades, the United States has attempted to
play powerbroker in the region. If he denies this, then he is simply ignorant of history. In my opinion, the United States has meddled in the
affairs of other countries too much, particularly when it wasn't even vital to our security or interests.
Also, the email asks why the "winners" must reach out to the other side....If it doesn't happen, I don't think Bush can reform Social
Security...then he will be a lame duck president.
The question he asks "Are you better off now than four years ago" is a largely subjective one. Some are better off, some are the same, some are
Also, point out that there isn't really all that much difference between Bush and Kerry....I'm sure that'll get him upset.
No Child Left
Behind was written by Ted Kennedy. In fact the only real criticism Democrats have of it is that we aren't spending enough money on it. The same is
true of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.
Also, he tries to make sound as if Bush has a sweeping mandate, but his figures are misleading. I am sure the figures he provided are correct, but it
is broken up into different demographics. The popular vote won by both candidates is relatively close.