posted on Aug, 1 2013 @ 06:43 PM
reply to post by CoolStoryMan
"Martin assaulted Zimmerman first, and continued the beatdown. TRUTH. which was left out of your post." This is speculation. This is NOT truth and
only one possibility. It's Zimmerman's word vs no one. No one saw the total fight, no one saw the first hit passed. The witnesses only saw when
Travon got the upper hand. Just because Trayvon was winning didnt mean he was the aggressor.
"Questioning someone who isn't from your neighborhood after a string of burglaries is NOT stalking, and is NOT against the law." Actually if you
listen to the tapes, it was TRAYVON who questioned Zimmerman, "why are you following me?" Not the other way around. It was then that the phone was
dropped and a scuffle was heard. It's very possible that Zimmerman freaked out, assaulted Trayvon first, causing the phone to drop, and then trayvon
gained the upper hand.
"Assaulting someone IS against the law" True. The unproven first assailant is the reason Zimmerman was found not guilty. NOT that Trayvon was proven
to assault Zimmerman first. You have the law confused.
"We can argue whether Zimmerman should have minded his own business, sure.
but this never escalates if Martin doesn't assault anyone either" or if Zimmerman doesnt assault anyone either as well.
Too many people on both sides are replacing their own personal bias and speculation as fact.