It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Garkiniss
I think you have the wrong "they" and "them" in your above post. It's the politicians who have made all of this happen. Blame the right people.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
reply to post by pavil
Yes "profits". The money remaining after all bills, employees, CEO salary, shareholders, and investors have been paid.
Instead of using that money to open another hundred unnecessary stores, or lobby on Capital Hill, or to give Mike Duke another raise, they should spend it taking care of the employees they already have.
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by Garkiniss
reply to post by pavil
Yes "profits". The money remaining after all bills, employees, CEO salary, shareholders, and investors have been paid.
Instead of using that money to open another hundred unnecessary stores, or lobby on Capital Hill, or to give Mike Duke another raise, they should spend it taking care of the employees they already have.
Yeah.... building those 100 more "unnecessary" stores wouldn't do anything to help the employment situation or the economy in general, right? Forget about the businesses that would have to produce the materials to make those stores, or the construction companies that would actually build them, they don't matter either. And those 40,000 more people that Walmart would have hired to man those stores....they are better off not working than working for evil Walmart. That 40,000 doesn't even include the extra trucks and drivers and warehouses ect... that would be needed for a 100 more stores.
Yeah...... what was I thinking??????
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Garkiniss
Oh, by that same thinking, I therefore get to dictate how you should run your business.
I love the progressive mindset, acceptance and coexistence, unless it isn't the same acceptance as you.
I almost forgot, it is always different for Progressives. .
Originally posted by Metallicus
Here's a fact for all of you that think this is a great idea.
If you force businesses to pay a living wage the prices go up to cover those new increased cost and all of a sudden the new living wage is too little again. You can't legislate a country into prosperity.
Economics 101.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by doobydoll
Wow, spoken by a Progressive from the Y generation.
How is that book on Marxism coming along?
Yeah, greed huh?
I guess you have no issue with money taken from my paycheck, which should be used to provide for MY family, but instead stolen and given to someone else.
Oh, forgot, seems that MY greed leads me to give 10% of my monthly earnings to charity. Yeah, real greedy.
How much do you, mr progressive, give to charity? I bet like most people of your mindset, close to nothing, as you expect the Govt to take care of that, so long as you get to bitch and complain about all of the plight in the world.
As for my job, funny as your comments sounds like someone that doesn't work, or is jealous of those that are higher up and earn more then you.
So, I guess I will go back to my day job tomorrow, and then off to my company after that, work those two things and continue to EARN MY pay, while people like you continue to leech off of society and the govt.
Oh, and I do have a say, as I vote and the business I own will be able to lobby next year. So.....seems like you are still at the bottom rung, and will stay there.
Enjoy your view from the bottom.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
The difference being, I don't need my business regulated because I pay a more than fair wage for a day's labor.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Wal-Mart has to resort to subpar-to-slave wages to keep its business afloat, meanwhile dragging the economy down with it. You can't tell me that's a good business model.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
We're just running around in circles here. Agree to disagree?
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Garkiniss
Not buying it.
Originally posted by doobydoll
No, it's YOU who doesn't have a problem with that. Your money wouldn't be 'stolen' and given to the working poor if Walmart paid them enough to live on, but you would prefer them to continue to be underpaid. so you have no choice but to suck it up no matter who you vote for.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I don't believe you give anything to anyone. I can't see why someone like you who begrudges working people a basic living, would give any of your money away to anyone for nothing. Doesn't make sense.
Originally posted by doobydoll
No I don't work, and I don't claim any government assistance either because I have an income.
Originally posted by doobydoll
But if I did need to claim benefits to live, I certainly would.
Originally posted by doobydoll
That's what they're there for, and soon more and more working people will be needing to claim them.
Originally posted by doobydoll
And seeing as you haven't realised it yet, that means more tax for you. So hurry along and don't be late for work.
Originally posted by doobydoll
I will thanks. The view from down here is very revealing.
Originally posted by doobydoll
More and more working people are being screwed out of a proper wage and need to claim taxpayer money to survive. Those on the next rung up are the next in line to be screwed. This will continue until every working person is on the bottom rung, and mega-corporations will own all the upper ones.
Originally posted by doobydoll
When they can't squeeze another red cent from the working poor, do you think they will be satisfied and stop there? They won't. They'll come after your money.
Originally posted by doobydoll
See ya down here soon.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
I don't really give a damn what you buy.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
If you can tell me that a successful business model includes not being able to pay
a fair wage, while shipping jobs overseas to take advantage of indentured servants, then you
and I vary quite a bit on what we believe constitutes "success."
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by Garkiniss
The difference being, I don't need my business regulated because I pay a more than fair wage for a day's labor.
Oh, how I love it when Progressives state the whole "well, it's different" argument. It is always different for people like you.
So, YOU get to determine what is a fair days wage, right?
Now, is that because you own the business, or is that because you believe you get to decide what is fair because of your Progressive ideals?
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Wal-Mart has to resort to subpar-to-slave wages to keep its business afloat, meanwhile dragging the economy down with it. You can't tell me that's a good business model.
Sub-par??? Yeah, because $9 a hour, or $12 an hour in my area is SO sub-par. Sounds like you live in a real crap hole if Walmart is paying "sub-par" wages.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
We're just running around in circles here. Agree to disagree?
Not really, as you want to run everyone's life, as per your standards.
I want people to be left alone and allowed to fail or succeed on their own merit.