It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by Garkiniss
Other people who have experience in this country in my field make more money than I do... some a lot more....
I am not the slightest bit bothered because I (and only I) accepted this job with this pay.... no one forced me to, no one held a gun to my head and made me accept something.... I did, and at that time it was quite acceptable and reasonable for me to accept it.
My boss is allowing me the platform for experience on top of education, where I can take that experience, if I use it wisely, and leave here making twice my pay working less hours when I find the right company to work for who would find me an asset to their company....
Until then, I live just fine, have all my needs met, and am gaining experience that is, to me, priceless.....
I do not feel anyone has wronged me or taken undo advantage.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
reply to post by MuzzleBreak
That 89¢ would come to $11.57 per hour today. That's far more livable than $7.25 per hour, which would've been 55¢ back then, wouldn't you agree?
If you want to compare the value of a $0.89 Income or Wealth , in 1966 there are three choices. In 2012 the relative:
historic standard of living value of that income or wealth is $6.30
economic status value of that income or wealth is $11.10
economic power value of that income or wealth is $17.70
Originally posted by MuzzleBreak
If you want to compare the value of a $0.89 Income or Wealth , in 1966 there are three choices. In 2012 the relative:
historic standard of living value of that income or wealth is $6.30
economic status value of that income or wealth is $11.10
economic power value of that income or wealth is $17.70
The standard of living value is $6.30. The "status" value is a bit vague.
Are you slow or something?
Wal-Mart costs taxpayers plenty of money because their employees have to go on food stamps just to live.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
Nothing worthwhile in life is ever easy
I am starting out in life now (granted for the second time but it is from the very bottom and with nothing) and my parents were starting out in the 1960's.... I live about the same as my parents did then...
...with the same amount of purchasing power.
Through hard work and determination I will make it.....
Originally posted by MuzzleBreak
I worked as a stock-boy/checker at Walmart in 1966 after school and on weekends. Although minimum wage at that time was $1.25, there were workers who were exempt. I was paid $0.89/hr. Still made enough in one year during high-school to pay for a semester at college.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
.......
In other words, if Walmart decided to use 100% of its operating profit to pay all of its employees more, the average store associate's salary would go from $20,000 to $30,000, pushing them above the poverty line. This would reduce the need for Government assist programs and lower taxes. Will this ever happen? Doubtful.