It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by macman
I have read every post in this thread and my conclusion is thus. These people who are against a company with only a 3.5% profit margin are those who are collectivists.
They appear to have a jealousy of people who make money. They appear to think working to get ahead is evil and they want rich people to distribute everything to those not as well off. Basically, they have a socialist mindset.
Because of this, nothing we can say will help them understand. They have an agenda which is against the very model this country was built on....
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
If you want someone to blame for this, look to your government, not the corporations you shop at.... look to our broken banking system and the government which supports it.....
edit on 2-8-2013 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
Becoming a socialist type of society is not the answer btw. THAT is not an option or an answer.
edit on 2-8-2013 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
If you want someone to blame for this, look to your government, not the corporations you shop at....
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Originally posted by Bearack
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Originally posted by Bearack
Just an FYI, Walmart doe snot control the conditions in the work place in China. All facilities are government run. They can use oversight of product, but have little control on conditions. Not condoning it, just stating a mere fact.
Wrong. Walmart chose to place that factory in China.
If I chose to place a baby in a shark tank, I can't say it's not my fault the baby was treated "badly" by the shark.
Even if it saved me 5 billion dollars a year, I wouldn't open a factory under those conditions. There's such a thing as ethics and morals.
I don't disagree hence why I did not condone the practice. However, I still put a portion of the blame on the consumer as they demand as cheap of products as possible. If we would just pay a little more at a place that manufactures in the US, eventually Walmart would need to follow suit. However, we will price shop a 60" TV and see that Walmart has it $200 cheaper for a name brand produced out of china and buy it without batting an eye.
Have you ever given much thought as to why people demand cheaper products? Could it be that people are earning half of what they earned 50 years ago? The "demand" in Supply & Demand is much more desperate than it used to be.
That's not the fault of the consumer. That isn't "choice" by the American people.
Originally posted by doobydoll
Why do you think that you should be paid more than a living wage, but unskilled workers should work for less than they need to live on?
Originally posted by doobydoll
They may be uneducated and unskilled but they work hard too, just as you do. And for the same reasons - to provide a living for their families, same as you.
Originally posted by doobydoll
Yes, I agree you should be paid more than living wage as a company senior, I'm not saying otherwise and I am happy some earn huge wages, good on them I say. But you people on high earnings seem to resent unskilled workers anything better than a working life of destitution and outright poverty, and I am really finding it difficult to understand why that is.
Originally posted by doobydoll
It's as if you all hate minimum-wage earners just because they're uneducated and poor, and for that they deserve nothing but scummy hard work, discrimination and poverty wages. How could you be so hateful to other human beings. I just don't understand it.
Originally posted by Toadmund
Maybe they should try for 4% then, and have 0.5% slated for the front end workers?
......
Is there any reason why people shouldn't think that way? In this day and age where the rich get rich by siphoning off regular people by either overpriced for profit margined goods or pay that is too low?
Originally posted by Garkiniss
It's funny that you think there's a difference between the two.
That being said; when the six members of the Walton family earn more than 30% of American population combined, there's a problem.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
The issue isn't the value of the dollar, which is in decline I agree. It's that CEOs fancy themselves 12.5x more important that they used to. It's a Rock Star attitude, plain and simple.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
The failing value of the dollar, coupled with the uneven inflation-to-wage ratio is a reason to pay people more not less.
Originally posted by Bearack
It surely is the consumers fault. People have to have the newest, biggest, brightest thing they can get their hands on. I see people with EBT cards dialing their homies on their brand new IPhone 5 while their getting into their 2013 Escalade. My old neighbor who recently foreclosed on his house just bought a 60" TV because his friend just bought one. We are a NATION OF CONSUMERS that have a propensity for greed. I've even fallen prey to this mentality as I just put my preorder in for the new PS4 (Granted, I no longer pay for cable and use Netflix and Hulu plus on these systems) while I also drive my new car. But by the same token, we make dinner from near scratch (so much cheaper this way and healthier as well). We rarely go to fast food joints (for a treat every now and then) and with every paycheck, we automatically put 10% of our paycheck into savings regardless if we can or not. My retirement might not be lavish, but I'll be able to afford it comfortably.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Answer me this: Do you think it's fair that a worker today earns roughly half of what a worker earned 50 years ago doing the same job, while his employer earns 12½ times MORE than someone doing their exact job 50 years ago?
Originally posted by macman
WHAT problem is there.
They built a business. YOU didn't.
All of this crap stems from jealousy. Plain and simple. You want what they have. You have been told you can't obtain it, except to bring them down.
If you don't like what you are making at Job X, go to Job Y.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Originally posted by Bearack
It surely is the consumers fault. People have to have the newest, biggest, brightest thing they can get their hands on. I see people with EBT cards dialing their homies on their brand new IPhone 5 while their getting into their 2013 Escalade. My old neighbor who recently foreclosed on his house just bought a 60" TV because his friend just bought one. We are a NATION OF CONSUMERS that have a propensity for greed. I've even fallen prey to this mentality as I just put my preorder in for the new PS4 (Granted, I no longer pay for cable and use Netflix and Hulu plus on these systems) while I also drive my new car. But by the same token, we make dinner from near scratch (so much cheaper this way and healthier as well). We rarely go to fast food joints (for a treat every now and then) and with every paycheck, we automatically put 10% of our paycheck into savings regardless if we can or not. My retirement might not be lavish, but I'll be able to afford it comfortably.
Some may have just purchased that new car, that new phone, and then lost their jobs. You don't know everyone's circumstance, so reserve judgement.
Originally posted by GarkinissI'm sure there are some who abuse the system. Always have been. Always will be. None more guilty than the those at the top. However, I've driven the same car for 12 years, have no cell phone, and waited 6 years after marrying my wife to start a family. We wanted to wait until we knew we were secure before we added the expense of a child. So that's what we did.
Originally posted by Garkiniss In 2006 my wife was managing a store and I was working in flooring for the no.1 tile/stone installation company in our area. We were doing well. So we decided it was time to have a child. Less than a month after my son was born in 2007 the economy took a dive and my wife's store was closed, the construction business dried up in our area because 80% of our work came from new home owners or people looking to sell, so there we were; new baby boy, no jobs. We ended up having to look to WIC and Food Stamps just to get by.
Originally posted by GarkinissI have a friend who bought a brand new vehicle last year. Her husband was doing well, she was making good money, and they could afford the luxury. They even bought a nice big television and got some new phones. This year? My friend lost her job, and her husband's hours have been cut by 50%. She called me the other day inquiring about how to get on an EBT program to feed her two little girls while her husband took to the road chasing hours.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Answer me this: Do you think it's fair that a worker today earns roughly half of what a worker earned 50 years ago doing the same job, while his employer earns 12½ times MORE than someone doing their exact job 50 years ago?
YES. Because I don't own the company in this situation. It is not my place to worry about what a company makes.
You need to be reminded where you sit in the working world. This moronic idea that a worker gets to demand something out of a company is beyond the stigma associated with the self absorbed narcissism of the Y Generation.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
They don't need to be brought down. Walmart could afford to pay a living wage and not have to raise prices, and still bring in billions in profits.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
You want to condone economic slavery, that's fine. I can't.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Except that job Y and Z have been removed by Job X.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
The Free Market is great in theory, but it requires honesty, restraint, ethics, and wisdom to work properly. Our republic requires the same standards.
[/quoet]
Yeah, too bad Progressives are working hard to remove the basis of such a thing. Family and faith.
Originally posted by Garkiniss
Unfortunately neither live up to their potential, thus our failing economy. Bankers and Corporations killed this economy. Remember that.
No, Govt is the cause of the failure.
And before you get into who control this and that. Govt creates and enforces the law. If Corporations influence this, it is the fault of the Govt, as they allow, accept and even welcome it.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or BLS, all paramedics and EMTs made an average annual wage of $34,030, or $16.36 per hour. The middle 50 percent of this group earned between $24,420 and $40,440, or $11.74 and $19.44 per hour. The median salary was $30,710 per year, equaling $14.77 per hour.
In its May 2011 figures, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports an average hourly wage of $12.22 for nursing assistants and related staff, or $25,420 per year. There is a considerable variance between the highest and lowest earners, with 10 percent of nursing assistants earning $8.68 per hour or less, and 10 percent earning $16.91 per hour or more. Assuming a 40-hour work week, this represents earnings of $18,060 per year at the low end of the scale and $35,170 at the high end. Their median income was $11.63 per hour, or $24,190 per year.