It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My nervous breakdowns dont involve threatening people with knives... as for becoming mentally ill, in that case, I will then face my destiny, whichever it is, if it is taking 9 bullets because I threatened a whole streetcar with a knife, so be it.
What you think I open an exception for myself? I dont. I treat others as I wish they would treat me. Actually they could shoot me BEFORE I pose a threat to anyone if I become mentally ill... if I cant shoot myself.
Originally posted by jaws1975
He was contained in the streetcar, no one else was in the streetcar, there was no way for him to escape. Why not wait for swat to extricate him?
Originally posted by jaws1975
If he was lunging for the police when he was shot, his forward momentum would have had him fall out of the streetcar, or at least onto the steps.
Guys who are on enough drugs or with enough adrenaline can withstand massive amounts of damage to their bodies and still present a threat. When someone is acting irrationally, such as rushing the police with a knife, the officers are going to assume that they are on something.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by jaws1975
He was contained in the streetcar, no one else was in the streetcar, there was no way for him to escape. Why not wait for swat to extricate him?
Why not just wait until old age, or starvation?
That is not the polices job, their job is to get the situation under control and effect an arrest.
They tried, he resisted.
Under the “Use of Force Matrix” and the “21 foot rule” the police will be found to be justified.
Originally posted by jaws1975
If he was lunging for the police when he was shot, his forward momentum would have had him fall out of the streetcar, or at least onto the steps.
He was told to stop, and he didn't. He doesn't have to be “lunging for the police”. When the police give you a “lawful order” its not an option, like “maybe I'll comply when I calm down and sober up”, its an ORDER and it means NOW...
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by Carreau
Considering this is Toronto, where you barely here any gun fights, especially Cops shooting a civilian..Heck last year was probably the most gun shots and it was 4/per year...
9x shots for a guy who wasn't moving, not aggressive and on a empty street car?
I understand you have to drop whatever you were doing if police ask you, i mean i would, but what prompted the 9x shots?
Gun is a last resort too.
www.torontopolice.on.ca...
Year to Date Shootings Last Year to Previous Updated: 2013.07.29 08:16
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2010-- 2011-- 2012 --2013--Percent --Absolute -----------------------------------------------------------------------.........--.........--..........--........--Change -- Change
Occurrences--------------------------------------------------------136 ----118-----154--- 109 --(-29.2%) -----(-45)
Victims- --------------------------------------------------------------172 ----144 ----216 ---147---(-31.9%) -----(-69)
Year to Date Shootings Involving Injury or Death Death ----12 ------15 -----22 -----12 --(-45.5%) ------(-10)
Injuries-----------------------------------------------------------------60 ------59 -----90 -----54 --(-40.0%) ------(-36)
Death/Injury Total ---------------------------------------------------72 ------74 ---112 -----66 --(-41%) ---------(-46)
Year to Date Shootings Without Victim or Injury No Injuries 62 -------47 ----73 -----54 --(-26.0%) -----(-19)
Unknown --------------------------------------------------------------38 -------23 ----31 -----27 --(-12.9%) --------(-4)
No Injury Total ------------------------------------------------------100 -------70 --104 -----81 --(-22.1%)--------(-23)
Year to Date Homicides **2010 -----2011 ---2012 ---2013 ---Percent Change -----Absolute Change
Stabbing -------------------------8 ----------3 -------4 ------11 ----------175.0% -------------------7
Shooting -----------------------12 ---------15 -----22 ------12 ---------(-45.5%) ---------------(-10)
Other ---------------------------14 ---------11 ------7 -------11 -----------57.1% ------------------4
Grand Total -------------------34 ---------29 ----33 -------34 -------------3.0% ------------------1
** Data Source: Cognos - Year to Date Daily Shootings With Homicide Report
Originally posted by Argyll
What protocols exist for dealing with potentially mentally ill suspects?.....why would officers assume "drugs" and not "mentally ill"?
Originally posted by Argyll
I'm just genuinely interested to know if there is a procedure for dealing with a mentally ill person in a similar scenario?
• there are situations where deadly force is avoidable and officers should consider disengagement or tactical repositioning. In the view of some officers, though, disengagement may be considered a “retreat”, “an objectionable concept to many police officers (Geller, Scott: 310).” However, instruction that emphasizes the use of these options, as part of judgement training, may combat a police culture which values direct action - improving the chances of successful non-violent conclusions to incidents;
• officers need the skills to negotiate during volatile situations;
• there is a need to emphasize officers’ responsibility to isolate and contain the situation until the arrival of personnel specially trained to deal with the matter;
• although the Service maintains a use of force data base there is a need to include additional information from police related shootings;
• officers should be discouraged from shooting at or from moving vehicles because it is always dangerous and rarely effective;
• officers require enhanced training to better understand emotionally disturbed persons, especially in volatile situations so that officers can better control their own fears;
• the advice and instruction available to the Service through a forensic psychiatrist has proven invaluable;
• enhanced uniform supervisory levels are required;
• that there is a need for professional, enthusiastic coach officers who, as role models, will help instill positive attitudes and values to guide new constables;
• the Service must continue to explore the option of less lethal weapons.
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Can you please show me the law that says you have to obey police like a dog on a chain?
Originally posted by DerekJR321
Basically you are advocating this kids murder because he didn't immediately "obey" these cops.
Originally posted by Realtruth
So what would your decision be if you had to get the knife away from him? Could you trust that he didn't have more weapons hidden?edit on 29-7-2013 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)