posted on Jul, 29 2013 @ 10:24 AM
If he is the vicar of Christ, or is the embodiment of Christ on earth, wants other humans to bow down, kiss his ring etc, wouldn't he be bound by this
heavy responsibility and also if he has the "keys" wouldn't he have some judgement or opinion to make on anything that previously was deemed not
kosher in the bible or canons of the church historically, I mean if this is the case and was the case all along shouldn't all of the pontiffs have
felt like this? why would any church present, or in history have judged, tortured and burned at the stake anyone that opposes the teachings of the
church or had not been in line with their teachings? it really makes zero sense to me.
The questions I have on this subject is who is worse, the heretic? or the hypocrite ? and who is the most credible?
Hypocrite - Merriam-Webster Online
a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion. 2. : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
heretic - definition of heretic by the Free Online Dictionary ...
A person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the Roman Catholic Church.
edit on 29-7-2013 by phinubian because: (no reason given)