This is a thread where I don’t want to necessarily espouse my own ideas and leave it at that. I invite others to express their opinion on why the
West is all of a sudden propping up Islamic; Al Qaeda allied groups in the Arab spring movements.
I will, though, venture to say that I am a believer in the doctrine of the NWO conspiracy. I am not a fanatic type like Alex Jones. I adhere somewhat
to the more sober analyst on Global Research. www.globalresearch.ca...
Regarding the US supporting the Arab Spring movements in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and now Syria, where clearly the supposed enemy of the US—an Al Qaeda
supported Islamists group takes over the country seems contrary to US policy towards Islamists ideology. Why is the US paving the way for Islamist
governments in the Middle East?
I know they aren’t trying to promote freedom and democracy.
I suspect that the neo-con idea of “the clash of civilizations” that being the secular West versus the Islamic culture was never a reality or any
legitimate threat to the West.
It was a smoke screen to advocate the suppressive measures of the reaction to 911 such as the Patriot act, NDA and other measures.
What the West really wants is to; in a few years create the Islamic fanatical regimes so they can have their “war of civilizations”. The fact of
the matter was that there never was any Islamic threat only a few disgruntled “maniacs “Al Qaeda” that could not make a real war of
civilizations. Therefore the West surreptitiously is attempting to actually create some militant Islamic force or movement. Therein they can stir up
enough conflict and international tension that will result in the proverbial war of civilizations the maniacal neo-con NWO, Bildebergers want.
Looking at Syria, it is an anomaly that the Western, NATO alliance is so organized against Assad’s regime that everyone knows the insurgents are
riddled with Al Qaeda allies that will— like in Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt—undoubtedly install some form of Islamists regime if Assad is
overthrown. Why is NATO doing this? It doesn’t make sense.
The Brits, the French, and the Americans—like an organized mob—are fanatic in their unified quest to overthrow these Arab regimes and install a
potential Islamic opponent, and have been successful already in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt where an Islamist government has taken over. This makes no
strategic sense on its face if the West is truly frightened of Islamic ideology; therefore it seems that the West has an ulterior motive in promoting
these revolutions. What is that motive?
Are they merely intent on destabilizing these countries: look at Libya....a mess, look at Egypt…a mess, and look at Tunisia...a mess, as well.