It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Akragon
perhaps they're keeping themselves hidden because the general population of the earth are mentally inept and afraid of them... and would consider them demons... and thus... try to kill them even if they wanted to help?
Originally posted by Druscilla
I also don't really see much sense in hostile aliens except from a colonization standpoint.
Even from a colonization standpoint, there's arguments against hostile action where visitors could very well be quite successful in sharing the planet with us.
From a resource standpoint, There's plenty minerals, ore, and raw material available throughout the solar system in less expensive abundance than having to deal with Earth's 1G gravity well.
There's Europa, an entire moon of Water, as well as all the slushy abundance of icy body material in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, all much less energy expensive to get at and exploit than bothering with Earth.
Mars itself could be mined less expensively than Earth.
Earth would be a last stop on working outside-inwards in any resource exploitation operation, and by the time we even knew anything was wrong with our Solar System, by the time we detected Pluto being broken up or towed off and broken down, it'd be too late and there'd be nothing we could really do to fight against technological civilizations that can break down entire solar systems for resources.
I am 100% with you on this one. I will be going to Thailand and will be meditating and getting some massages and focusing on that happy ending.
I just meditate and hold the happy ending, and believe nothing but that is going to happen.
Originally posted by Akragon
Since Aliens seems to be the topic of the day... I was wondering
IF a hostile alien race decided to show up on earth.... Could we put up any kind of defence against a civilisation who's weapons are likely hundreds of years more advanced then our primitive guns?
The Kardashev scale is a method of measuring a civilization's level of technological advancement, based on the amount of energy a civilization is able to utilize. The scale has three designated categories called Type I, II, and III. A Type I civilization uses all available resources impinging on its home planet, Type II harnesses all the energy of its star, and Type III of its galaxy. The scale is only hypothetical and in terms of an actual civilization, highly speculative; however, it puts energy consumption of an entire civilization in a cosmic perspective. It was first proposed in 1964 by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev. Various extensions to the scale have been proposed since, ranging from a wider range of power levels (types 0, IV and V) to the use of metrics other than pure power.
Michio Kaku suggested that humans may attain Type I status in about 100–200 years, Type II status in a few thousand years, and Type III status in about 100,000 to a million years
The Kardashev scale is a method of measuring a civilization's level of technological advancement, based on the amount of energy a civilization is able to utilize. The scale has three designated categories called Type I, II, and III. A Type I civilization uses all available resources impinging on its home planet, Type II harnesses all the energy of its star, and Type III of its galaxy. The scale is only hypothetical and in terms of an actual civilization, highly speculative; however, it puts energy consumption of an entire civilization in a cosmic perspective. It was first proposed in 1964 by the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev. Various extensions to the scale have been proposed since, ranging from a wider range of power levels (types 0, IV and V) to the use of metrics other than pure power.