It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rubio stood with Paul during the filibuster, taking to the Senate floor on March 6. Casual observers might have thought Rubio shared Paul’s concern about drones. Rubio, however, only said he thinks Paul deserved an answer from the Obama administration over whether a U.S. citizen could be targeted on U.S. soil. No, Attorney General Eric Holder finally answered. That ended Paul’s filibuster and the Senate voted to confirm John Brennan as CIA director. Rubio sided with the majority, choosing not to stand with Rand.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by beezzer
Hey fuzzy one, you tell them there may be another bunny coming after ya and keep some space on the Island open! The South Pacific isn't sounding too bad, is it? Paradise, once we all adapt to every single thing, both plant and animal, trying to kill us in one way or another down there.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by TDawgRex
I'll be amazed if Christie doesn't have a heart attack by 2016.
He isn't healthy. He isn't healthy enough for the job of POTUS. It's a high stress job and is hard on even healthy people, let alone someone who is a type-A personality and who is one or two big macs away from a full blow out.
Originally posted by HauntWok
Christie has a very good point. Rand is dangerous. So is the "Libertarian" ideology he brings with him.
I put quote marks around Libertarian because the brand of libertarianism that Rand brings to the table isn't really libertarianism but just selfishness.
You can also tell a lot about a person by the kinds of people they attract to themselves.
And this is the kind of people that Rand surrounds himself with. I must have missed the part of Libertarianism where curb stomping women was deemed acceptable. But it is in Rand's version of Libertarianism.
Originally posted by neo96
He and the current administrations best buds.
Tell ya what ?
Christie is dangerous.
edit on 26-7-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WaterBottle
Rand Paul is dangerous and he is in no way shape or form a libertarian. He even says this himself.
Chris Christie and him are nearly identical politically anyway. Remember when Christie gave millions of dollars in tax cuts to coporations in NJ and then they outsourced jobs.
Trickle down economics
edit on 26-7-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)