Obama - Refused Entry To Republicans At Speech Based On Clothing Worn!

Originally posted by Auricom
reply to post by elouina

 

I guess they should have dressed in hoodies while wearing backpacks with breaking and entering tools...

Wonder how they'd handle that one.

OMG

reply to post by Auricom


They should have shot them and keep the speech going on.

Originally posted by elouina
Ok I am absolutely speechless over this. OMG what has happened to our country?

edit on 26-7-2013 by elouina because: (no reason given)

Everyone kept voting for these people, cycle after cycle, even though we all know better.

The folks in the cities have allowed themselves to be made into shadows of the people they should be. They live in fear, disarmed, and awaiting instructions from teh authorities before they do anything.

I mean, this is our problem that we created. And we have the power to fix it. Just not the balls.

Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

He needs to be heckled and challenged every time he steps to a podium as long as he is giving Castro-like Marxist propaganda speeches.

You sir, have no idea what Marxism is.

He is a Corporate Oligarch. Not a Marxist. There is a major difference between the two and ignorance on the subject weakens your argument to futility.

He is a progressive. Socialist,Communist,Fascist are all forms of oligarchies. Look back Hitler did not rule Germany alone. Stalin did not rule Russia alone.


It is time people learn the cold hard truths because history really is repeating itself.

I'm going to need another source for this. Sorry but the page you linked is full of right wing propaganda.

reply to post by NOTurTypical

Can this administration get any more absurd?

They(Republicans) did not do the same.

and this

Obama is obviously campaigning for the 2014 elections.

I was pointing out the fact that, this has been done by "non democratic" political party as well. Why are you so offended by that fact? oh never mind, its a political thing right?

This site, these forums, the internet, the US, the entire world is absolutely brimming with people who only get outraged when the "other guy" does something. Had a (D) been after GW Bush's name self proclaimed liberals and progressives (though they're actually clueless to what those words actually mean) would have cheered at all his policies... similarly now if Obama had an (R) after his name self proclaimed conservatives (though they're actually clueless to what the word actually means) would be worshipping him like a God.

Originally posted by Kali74
This site, these forums, the internet, the US, the entire world is absolutely brimming with people who only get outraged when the "other guy" does something. Had a (D) been after GW Bush's name self proclaimed liberals and progressives (though they're actually clueless to what those words actually mean) would have cheered at all his policies... similarly now if Obama had an (R) after his name self proclaimed conservatives (though they're actually clueless to what the word actually means) would be worshipping him like a God.

That certainly isn't true. Conservatives were just as angry with GWB when he turned out to be a Progressive, big-government, status quo hack.

reply to post by luciddream


And I was pointing out the fact that, to use two wrong make a right as some sort of counterpoint is a fallacy of logic.

Why are you offended by that??

reply to post by NOTurTypical


Not offended, or "trying to make a right", i just like to burst people's bubbles that their political party is not so special.

Its like Pot calling Kettle black.

Originally posted by elouina
Ok I am absolutely speechless over this. OMG what has happened to our country?

edit on 26-7-2013 by elouina because: (no reason given)

c'mon...republicans have done that in congress, and I think democrats have finally said enough is enough....it's no big secret who hates Obama and everything he does, even when it's been republicans own ideas on policy. tea party people don't give a damn what ideas Obama has, and they don't want any republican to work on legislation with him, even if it improves Americans lives. they are there to shout him down, call him names and disrupt the venue...let's see how many republican lawmakers let OWS activists come to their meetings...I'll give you a hint, none.

Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

Not offended, or "trying to make a right", i just like to burst people's bubbles that their political party is not so special.

Its like Pot calling Kettle black.

Oh. According to you mentioning facts somehow implies you're offended, at least we got that cleared up. Now, trying to rationalize the employment of a fallacy of logic doesn't change the fact that one was employed.

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by elouina

 

Profiling is an often common occurrence when living in a police-state under a tyrant who's regime manipulates events and media.

Hey Beez --

(a) Local cop..

Missouri College Republicans State Treasurer Courtney Scott told Campus Reform on Thursday that an unidentified police officer told the group they were barred from the event for “security reasons and for the president’s protection.”

(b) Bush and every recent POTUS has done the same thing...it's policy...not Obama specific...feel free to debate the policy though.

Demos decry Bush rally ouster over T-shirts
By Bend Bugle News Reports
Published: October 17, 2004

WASHINGTON – Responding to the number of examples of American voters being turned away, or removed from George W. Bush’s visits to their cities and states, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe hosted a national conference call with Oregon teachers who were kicked out of an Oct. 14 Medford Bush rally for wearing T-shirts saying, “Protect Our Civil Liberties.”

www.bendbugle.com...

And here again in 2005
www.foxnews.com...

I can find Clinton doing it as well...

Common policy...again we can debate policy, but the claim it is a "new" police state doesn't hold up...Cops routinely screen out potential "disruptions" during Presidential speeches.

Originally posted by HauntWok
Why shouldn't he?

All they would do is heckle him, be disrespectful and obnoxious. Time was that we Americans respected the office of the president. Those days (especially with this president) have long passed.

I'm sorry but I just gave myself an stroke laughing.
It's time the president started respecting the office of the president.

Although I disagree with this censorship in any form -

if they had to make a case for security reasons perhaps I can see the Tea Party and the Republican t-shirts.. but patriotic t-shirts in general?

Thats Double Nuts. Doesn't the President want people to be Patriotic?

I hope these students Raise Holy Hell over this and this gets huge traction in the media to show people how corrupt Obama is.

I wanna ask him on Good Morning America why he's afraid of people with Republican t-shirts. I wanna ask him how he can justify this slamming of these kids constitutional rights.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


I didn't say there weren't conservatives angry with GW Bush, just as there are Democrats and Progressives angry with Obama. My point is this, there's more people or at least they're louder that only cry foul when something is done to them... not that something can be done.

reply to post by JohnPhoenix

if they had to make a case for security reasons perhaps I can see the Tea Party and the Republican t-shirts.. but patriotic t-shirts in general?

I noticed that as well. What's that say about our POTUS if he wants to distance himself from people who are promoting American patriotism?

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

I didn't say there weren't conservatives angry with GW Bush, just as there are Democrats and Progressives angry with Obama. My point is this, there's more people or at least they're louder that only cry foul when something is done to them... not that something can be done.

Alright. Well, I just wanted people to be clear that Bush was no Conservative. He is a Progressive. That's why we see no real change of course for the nation from Presidents 41-44.

I am so disappointed in our government officials on both sides, it took me a long time to admit the government was the real enemy, I did trust out government to protect and serve, many things came out about Bush that left me shocked.

There is a reason he is so quiet, and it isn't respect.

Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by Auricom

 

They should have shot them and keep the speech going on.

Dude, where's your sarcasm tag! Dude, where's your sarcasm tag!