It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by djr33222
Perhaps Martin's liver was that way because he drank alcohol.
Martin himself didn't say that he drank, but that he did drugs. Combine the social media postings from Martin himself AND the toxicology reports that came up positive for drug use ... and you have your answer.
The issue is, was he a drug user? The answer is, you can't prove it, not even remotely
Perhaps Martin's liver was that way because he drank alcohol.
Originally posted by djr33222
Martin posted on a social media site that he used lean... that doesn't matter.
The issue is, was he a drug user? The answer is, you can't prove it, not even remotely
Originally posted by djr33222
reply to post by butcherguy
Perhaps Martin's liver was that way because he drank alcohol.
Minimum amounts of alcohol intake associated with an increased risk of ALD range from 40 to 80 g/day for 10-12 years
Firstly, it doesn't matter because if on the day of the altercation no intoxicating substance was found in Martin's blood, in significant amounts so as to alter his behavior, then his past and alleged substance abuse is just brought up to attack his character.
Originally posted by djr33222
But they found TRACE amounts of THC.
So I ask you sir,
what does the fact that Martin smoked some weed a week ago (THC is stored in fat and thus remains in the body for long periods of time) have to do with his actions on the night he was killed?
You can call him a drug user all you want because the boy smoked some marijuana at one time or another,
but that doesn't make him a bad person.
Furthermore, you can't PROVE he was a drug addict, dependent on drugs, having withdrawal symptoms from not being on drugs, was violent because of drugs, or that his liver condition was the result of ingesting drugs.
Originally posted by djr33222
As FlyersFan said, liver damage can happen instantaneously.
Not that you subscribe to his beliefs...
Originally posted by djr33222
reply to post by butcherguy
As FlyersFan said, liver damage can happen instantaneously. Not that you subscribe to his beliefs...
Either way, I find it hard to believe that over the counter cough syrup is more harmful to the liver than alcohol is.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by djr33222
As FlyersFan said, liver damage can happen instantaneously.
It depends on the person and the substances being used and the combinations of substances as well as any hidden diseases.... Generally, alcoholism liver damage takes some time. But not with everyone ...
Not that you subscribe to his beliefs...
I"m a woman.
It CAN cause paranoia, violent tendencies, and brain damage. Doesn't mean it did.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I"m a woman.
Are you? Hmmmm. (Insert something flirtatious here.)