It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Do you have a valid link to verify this? Autopsy reports show internal organs normal. Maybe I missed something. I am not defending here but this seems speculative at best.
“Risks of Regular Use and Binges: Mania Violent Ideations, Antisocial Behavior and Paranoia Habituation and Psychological Addiction Tolerance and Physical Addiction Psychosis Liver, Kidney and Pancreas Damage“
Trayvon was admittedly, according to his Facebook conversations, a user of DXM and Purple Drank/Lean since at least June 2011.
His liver indicates the beginning stages of an unusual degrading known as “mild fatty metamorphasis”, and his brain tissue appeared compromised, both conditions symptomatic of DXM use.
His girlfriend describes their phone call as Trayvon being “paranoid”.
One such well known, and well documented side-effect is “anger”, or, “violent temperment”.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by FlyersFan
How do you know Martin wasn't protecting his community??? YOU DON'T!!! You have 1 side of the story. For all you know, Zimmerman could have been some kind of sexual predator.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
reply to post by Honor93
What "criminal" do you refer to? Can you show me PROOF of such criminal activities? I've yet to see any criminal activities committed by the deceased. However, there's much to be said about the criminal that got away with murder. And you say
criminal gets shotI don't see justice being served at all.
Justice was served, twice in the same case
That "stranger" said Trayvon was guilty of acting suspicious. If yoiu're gonna weigh something, on the scales of "justice"...weigh them with the same weight. BALANCE THE SCALE. Don't try to add weight to the other side.
in case it makes you feel better ... Trayvon was innocent UNTIL he chose to assault a stranger. better ?
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Verdicts established after in insufficient investigation should not be accepted as legally binding.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Was Trayvon a lean, mean, street-fighting machine, or was he a doped up no-hoper who couldn't even beat up a big, soft NW guy after sucker punching him to the ground, and being offered no resistance for 30+ seconds?
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by NavyDoc
Verdicts established after in insufficient investigation should not be accepted as legally binding. If you cared about truth and justice you'd be demanding every cop involved with that case be sacked, from the first cop who arrived on the scene without his gun drawn, because he knew who'd been doing the shooting, to the detective who spent less than 5 minutes "interviewing" Zimmerman before allowing him to go home. Raimondo would be shown a little bit of leniency for at least showing some concern for the dying victim.
Originally posted by superman2012
Someone wants a book deal.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by djr33222
Liver damage can happen instantly or it can happen over time or anywhere in between.
If .. as you suggest .. it happened over time, then it shows he was using the drug for a while.
He was a druggie as well as a thug.
I suggest you look at the Examiner's Report and try to gather some evidence supporting your notion that he was a "druggie". I'll help you out. You can't because there isn't any.
Verdicts established after in insufficient investigation should not be accepted as legally binding. If you cared about truth and justice you'd be demanding every cop involved with that case be sacked, from the first cop who arrived on the scene without his gun drawn, because he knew who'd been doing the shooting, to the detective who spent less than 5 minutes "interviewing" Zimmerman before allowing him to go home. Raimondo would be shown a little bit of leniency for at least showing some concern for the dying victim.
Originally posted by djr33222
I suggest you look at the Examiner's Report and try to gather some evidence supporting your notion
That doesn't seem to matter to you does it, that you can't provide facts to support your crazy theories?
Not only are you not qualified to be able to decipher the medical jargon contained in the Examiner's Report, you hardly sound like a doctor or clinical professional who would be able to accurately diagnose substance abuse, dependence or addiction in the behaviors of Mr. Martin.
I could care less if he was a thug.
You are not playing on my heartstrings or my delicate racial sentiments by calling Martin a thug.
The issue is, was he a drug user? The answer is, you can't prove it, not even remotely
Originally posted by djr33222
Perhaps Martin's liver was that way because he drank alcohol.