It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, formally inaugurated a new political party bearing the name of his antisecrecy organization on Thursday and declared his own unorthodox candidacy for a seat in the Australian Senate in national elections to be held later this year...
...“My plans are to essentially parachute in a crack troop of investigative journalists into the Senate and to do what we have done with WikiLeaks, in holding banks and government and intelligence agencies to account,”
Under Australian law, Mr. Assange would have to take his seat within one year of being elected, although the Senate could technically grant him an extension if he is unable to physically take his seat. The British government has stated its intention to arrest him if he leaves the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, which presents an unusual set of logistical obstacles should he win the election.
“There is, of course, some possibility that the Australian Senate would permit remote involvement. It’s never been done before, but it is theoretically possible,” Mr. Assange said. “But in any event we have candidates available to hold the seat until such time as I am available to take it.”
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Something on this has been bothering me from the start with Assange and Snowden...and this question is the best opportunity to ask about it, since it presents the most obvious moment to do something.
Okay.. We know England/America REALLY want Assange. Public Enemy Number 1 may be understating things in some circles. Fine Fine...they'll wait until the end of time or the Ecuadorian Embassy crumbles from time itself, probably. Same with Snowden in Russia...they REALLY want him enough to all but kidnap foreign heads of state that just MIGHT have the guy on their plane.
So...Here's the big boggle to those who know international law much better than I do. Why can't Snowden OR Assange be moved under full Military escort with diplomatic cover and protections of whatever nation has initiated the escort? Assange would be tricky..since I'd presume there would be very basic authorization issues of an armed force coming out the door of the Embassy in London..
Still... Russia or England..whichever. Why can't this be done? Doesn't that really bring it down to only TWO very cold choices for the U.S.? Either let the move happen ..or outright and openly commit an act of war upon a nation we have absolutely no hostilities with in ANY other form?? Would they? COULD they actually do that?
This seems the safe avenue...if any nation-state's military were willing to donate a cargo plane or private jet for the trip w/ the escort required to give a credible statement of intent for deterrence of stupid actions?
Originally posted by VoidHawk
They should send a team in to every country. Lets see who the people vote for.
I wonder if this whole thing with assange being accused happened because TPTB could see this coming!!
Think about it, we have nations all over the world who are really pee'd of with their leaders, would they vote for Julian? I bet they would!
What if this ALLEGED sexual offence charge had not happened. By that I mean suppose Julian and his team were free to go where they please. If that were the case we might know what their policies are!
Originally posted by uncommitted
Don't you think it would be totally and completely stupid to vote for someone when you have no idea what their policies are, apart from presumably allowing people to get away with not standing to trial for alleged sexual offences?
.
allowing people to get away with not standing to trial for alleged sexual offences
Originally posted by VoidHawk
What if this ALLEGED sexual offence charge had not happened. By that I mean suppose Julian and his team were free to go where they please. If that were the case we might know what their policies are!
Originally posted by uncommitted
Don't you think it would be totally and completely stupid to vote for someone when you have no idea what their policies are, apart from presumably allowing people to get away with not standing to trial for alleged sexual offences?
As for.
allowing people to get away with not standing to trial for alleged sexual offences
If its not true then he's gotten away with nothing!! To be honest I think it's those two ladies and those involved with them that should be investigated FIRST! They took Julian to dinner the day after the ALLEGED offence, that in my book speaks volumes.
the accusation is that by running with Assange I am attempting to whitewash allegations he sexually assaulted two Swedish women.
I don’t know what happened, and neither does anyone else. Because none of us knows what happened, no one has grounds to judge him or the two women as either guilty or innocent. Such judgments are for the courts.
Assange has not been charged with sexual assault or any other crime. Rather, Swedish authorities want him for questioning.
So what’s holding things up? The answer is the unyielding attitude of the Swedes. They won’t question Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy nor talk to him by video-link, nor make use of the routine legal solutions like those provided by the mutual legal assistance treaty to resolve the impasse.
What does Assange fear from Sweden? The same thing he fears from Britain – that the moment he sets foot outside the Ecuadorian embassy, he’ll be extradited to the US. There, he is likely to face charges under the espionage act for publishing sensitive information – including the collateral murder video - that whistleblower Bradley Manning says he leaked to WikiLeaks.org.
Michael Hastings @mmhastings
thought experiment: if assange had exposed thousands of secret docs from china,russia, iran, nk,etc,would we consider him a hero or villain?
1:19 PM - 28 Nov 10
Michael Hastings @mmhastings
@jackshafer on assange: "if you want to dismiss him...because he's a seething jerk, there are about 2,000 journalists I'd like you to meet"
5:23 PM - 30 Nov 10
Michael Hastings @mmhastings
For supporters of @RonPaul --Julian Assange gives a shout out to Dr. Paul in the new RS interview, via @Buzzfeed www.buzzfeed.com... …
11:57 AM - 18 Jan 12
Michael Hastings @mmhastings
If you haven't read it yet: @MMFlint and @TheOliverStone on Assange, Wikileaks and why Ecuador is doing the right thing www.nytimes.com... …
The New York Times
WikiLeaks and the Global Future of Free Speech
If Julian Assange is extradited to the United States, it would have consequences around the world.
12:20 PM - 21 Aug 12
Michael Hastings @mmhastings
Assange in the pages of the NYT book review: www.nytimes.com... …
The New York Times
The Banality of ‘Don’t Be Evil’ by Julian Assange
Two Google leaders have written a manifesto for technocratic imperialism.
4:44 PM - 1 Jun 13
WikiLeaks @wikileaks
Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.
3:07 PM - 19 Jun 13
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Anyone gullible enough to believe this BS against Assange, I surely hope doesn't have the ability to vote.
You only need an IQ of 8 to see that the women's stories are false and that Sweden only wants to question him so the US Can have him.
However, even if Assange did win, the powers that be in the US would put pressure on the AUS officials to deny him that victory.
It will be as simple as:
''legislation passed today unfortunately voids Mr Assanges senate seat due to ongoing investigations in Sweden on sexual assault charges''