It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by borntowatch
How could it be treason, thats absurd.
Perhaps you missed these quotes in my previous posts.
Jesus was arrested on a charge of treason and was crucified, a common form of execution for condemned criminals. To the Romans, Jesus was a troublemaker who had got his just desserts.
www.pbs.org...
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by borntowatch
How could it be treason, thats absurd.
Perhaps you missed these quotes in my previous posts.
Jesus was arrested on a charge of treason and was crucified, a common form of execution for condemned criminals. To the Romans, Jesus was a troublemaker who had got his just desserts.
www.pbs.org...
Arrested on a charge.......
Where was Jesus charged for treason.
Where is the evidence he was convicted of treason.
Its a simple question
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by borntowatch
How could it be treason, thats absurd.
Perhaps you missed these quotes in my previous posts.
Jesus was arrested on a charge of treason and was crucified, a common form of execution for condemned criminals. To the Romans, Jesus was a troublemaker who had got his just desserts.
www.pbs.org...
You have no evidence the charge was upheld and
Arrested on a charge.......
Where was Jesus charged for treason.
Where is the evidence he was convicted of treason.
Its a simple question
UHM, ........... His crucifixion?edit on 24-7-2013 by windword because: (no reason given)
John 19
7 The Jewish leaders insisted, “We have a law, and according to that law he must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God.”
John 19
15 But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!”
“Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked.
“We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered
16 Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified.
Romans 13
4 For the one in authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
John 18
36 Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.”
Yes, he did, and that is the point of the scene with Pilate -- Jesus completely submitted to the authority that Pilate thought that he had, even though he pointed out that Pilate had no authority apart from that which was given to him by God.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by borntowatch
Pilate approved his crucifixion on the grounds of him committing treason, a.k.a. claiming to be the "King of Jews" and "Son of God". Whether Pilate "washed his hands" doesn't matter, he still approved his death.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that Pilate sentenced him to death by crucifixion based on the charges that the Jews brought forth, a.k.a. treason and blasphemy. Why are you ignoring those obvious facts?
John 19
7 The Jewish leaders insisted, “We have a law, and according to that law he must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God.”
John 19
15 But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!”
“Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked.
“We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered
16 Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified.
I know, you want to ignore the facts because they go against your already held belief system.edit on 24-7-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-7-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
I disagree.
I hardly see that a life ministry of criticising the pharisees, calling them "Satan's sons", and a brood of vipers, while breaking Jewish laws, healing on the Sabbath, not washing his hands, teaching it's okay to eat unclean meats, etc., avoiding being stoned and thrown off a cliff by angry crowds, only to have that life culminate in his arrest and conviction, equates to a willful submission to their earthly authority.
By this time, what choice did Jesus have? He was under arrest. Besides that, he launched no defense, which was his right! Is that our example? Give up our rights too, even while innocent? Take up your cross and follow him to the slaughter, without defense?
If this is the message, why are Christians political activists? Under the philosophy of Romans 13, shouldn't they passively submit to authority, even if it's appears corrupt? God knows Jesus did/didn't.
edit on 25-7-2013 by windword because: (no reason given)
What earthly authority, the Pharisees laws (Jewish laws, Gods laws???), come on you are not suggesting that are you.
Also if you could tell me what were the laws made for.
Sheesh Dont all US citizens submit now to a corrupt government, dont you?
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by borntowatch
What earthly authority, the Pharisees laws (Jewish laws, Gods laws???), come on you are not suggesting that are you.
I don't have to. The Bible makes it clear.
Also if you could tell me what were the laws made for.
Social control.
Sheesh Dont all US citizens submit now to a corrupt government, dont you?
To an extent. I have practiced civil disobedience. So did Jesus, according to the Bible.
I certainly don't believe what's put forth in Romans 13. that all rulers are placed there by God, for our own good.
Also what possible inner metaphorical process could this be about? Men and woman of peace and love and good conscience generally don't need passages like that said to them, so who is the target audience?
That was a very good guess, sadly you show that though you may have read the bible, you didnt understand it.
What earthly authority are you talking about. I dont understand what you mean and how does the social control effect us,
1 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.
3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended.
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
the bible is clear the laws are made for men, not men for the law. Understand? I dont think so.
It’s a shame how many religious leaders still don’t understand the reason ancient religious texts like the Bible were written; it certainly wasn’t to establish a religion!
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by borntowatch
He allowed the crucifixion on the basis of Jesus claiming to be king and the son of God. If you can't see that then you are ignoring it.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by StalkerSolent
Yet the Jewish authorities are the ones who told Pilate more than once that Jesus was not their king and the only king they had was Caesar. So why would Pilate, after hearing from those that wanted Jesus crucified that he was NOT their king, still put "King of the Jews" on the cross? It was either to mock the Jews or to mock Jesus. Which do you think it was? Because he didn't put it there for no reason.