It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw
Originally posted by geobro
the travelling who ????? the brits are the real tribe not a bunch of kzars a pict i .
and the band played believe it it if you like
Yes the brits are but it goes back to celts and germanic pagan druids.
Don't forget, that the white pagan celts lived around that area of judea. Wearing foil death masks.
edit on 23-7-2013 by CrypticSouthpaw because: (no reason given)
yes it is sandstone it was stolen in 1950 and broken in two it was not the original it was xrayd and had a note in it it came back to scotland in 1999 or 2000 but the real one is black and never left . one of the people who stole it just died 2 weeks ago
Originally posted by guitarplayer
Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw
Originally posted by geobro
the travelling who ????? the brits are the real tribe not a bunch of kzars a pict i .
and the band played believe it it if you like
Yes the brits are but it goes back to celts and germanic pagan druids.
Don't forget, that the white pagan celts lived around that area of judea. Wearing foil death masks.
edit on 23-7-2013 by CrypticSouthpaw because: (no reason given)
It seems I read a story awhile back that the stone that they say in the one that Isaac made a pillow out of that the queens throne is on top of is rock that came from Scotland. Not limestone from Israel.
Originally posted by benrl
A team of Israeli archaeologists believes it has discovered the ruins of a palace belonging to the biblical King David, but other Israeli experts dispute the claim. Archaeologists from Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Israel's Antiquities Authority said their find, a large fortified complex west of Jerusalem at a site called Khirbet Qeiyafa , is the first palace of the biblical king ever to be discovered.
Archaeologists claim to have found King David's palace in Israel
Well there appears to still be questions of the validity of the find if it is or not, guess time will tell.
Interesting for a book that many consider allegorical often leads to real locations and people being found to have existed.edit on 22-7-2013 by benrl because: (no reason given)
Perhaps I am misunderstanding your post.
Why would he write "Palestine" instead of "Israel"?
There has never actually been a country, state or place named Palestine.
Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by Astyanax
By the way, exactly which Biblical stories are supported by archaeological evidence?
The construction of Hezekiah tunnel.
The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the faithful transmission of the Masoretic Text.
The Tel Dan Stele, according to some, points to the existance of David or at the very least a royal house in Israel.
Shisak's invasion of Israel during the reign of Rehoboam.
Trade between Israel and Sheba.
The reigns of Omri, Ahab, Uzziah, Hezekiah, Ahaz, Jeroboam II, and Jehoiachin.
The existence of a people called the Hittites.
The existence of Roman governors and proconsuls.
Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw
Originally posted by geobro
the travelling who ????? the brits are the real tribe not a bunch of kzars a pict i .
and the band played believe it it if you like
Yes the brits are but it goes back to celts and germanic pagan druids.
Don't forget, that the white pagan celts lived around that area of judea. Wearing foil death masks.
edit on 23-7-2013 by CrypticSouthpaw because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by benrl
A team of Israeli archaeologists believes it has discovered the ruins of a palace belonging to the biblical King David, but other Israeli experts dispute the claim. Archaeologists from Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Israel's Antiquities Authority said their find, a large fortified complex west of Jerusalem at a site called Khirbet Qeiyafa , is the first palace of the biblical king ever to be discovered.
Archaeologists claim to have found King David's palace in Israel
Well there appears to still be questions of the validity of the find if it is or not, guess time will tell.
Interesting for a book that many consider allegorical often leads to real locations and people being found to have existed.edit on 22-7-2013 by benrl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by guitarplayer
It seems I read a story awhile back that the stone that they say in the one that Isaac made a pillow out of that the queens throne is on top of is rock that came from Scotland. Not limestone from Israel.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by jeramie
I like how people desperately try to come up with some kind of reasoning as to why it "just can't be" when something which further confirms the Bible is found. It's almost comical the lengths some will go just to avoid admitting that the Word of God is correct.
Very interesting. Another one to add to the vast list of biblical archaeological finds!
Finding archeology that supports a historical narrative doesn't mean it supports a supernatural narrative also. The dude who wrote the Bible books live at that time or had oral traditions/texts to help them recall, it would be odd if they didn't known what was going on in the real world around them.
Example. I can write about todays world where I live in the Pacific Northwest, I can mention Seatle, the Governor of Oregon, etc, this is historic information but does that add credence to my claim that I worship a large purple sea slug named Stanley who created the world and has really, really bad communication skills, changes his mind a lot and seems generally confused?
No it does not, loledit on 23/7/13 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)
Perhaps not in the Right Wing Bible Believers' History Book.
Originally posted by jeramie
I like how people desperately try to come up with some kind of reasoning as to why it "just can't be" when something which further confirms the Bible is found. It's almost comical the lengths some will go just to avoid admitting that the Word of God is correct.
Very interesting. Another one to add to the vast list of biblical archaeological finds!
Originally posted by sealing
Star date 2114. I just came across this hard drive.
The purple slug Stanley is well understood but....
Where is this mythical city "Seatle" Hanslume speaks of?
Originally posted by geobro
yes it is sandstone it was stolen in 1950 and broken in two it was not the original it was xrayd and had a note in it it came back to scotland in 1999 or 2000 but the real one is black and never left . one of the people who stole it just died 2 weeks ago
Originally posted by guitarplayer
Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw
Originally posted by geobro
the travelling who ????? the brits are the real tribe not a bunch of kzars a pict i .
and the band played believe it it if you like
Yes the brits are but it goes back to celts and germanic pagan druids.
Don't forget, that the white pagan celts lived around that area of judea. Wearing foil death masks.
edit on 23-7-2013 by CrypticSouthpaw because: (no reason given)
It seems I read a story awhile back that the stone that they say in the one that Isaac made a pillow out of that the queens throne is on top of is rock that came from Scotland. Not limestone from Israel.
Now in the line stretching to Phoenicia from the land of the Persians the land is broad and the space abundant, but after Phoenicia this peninsula goes by the shore of our Sea along Palestine, Syria, and Egypt, where it ends; and in it there are three nations only.
– Herodotus, c.415BC
That's nice. I imagine most of these are fairly uncontroversial, or would be if you wrote 'Palestine' in place of 'Israel' there, and 'the existence of the people referred to in the Bible as the Hittites', since I believe they were really called something different. I was thinking more in terms of the confirmation of supernatural events mentioned in the Bible, though.
Now, if you will pardon the rest of us, we would like to return to the actual topic under discussion.