It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centhwevir1979
I feel like this entire threat violates the T&C. Remember that old argument, "Kids read this site too we can't have this type of material" ? I had a thread deleted, for instance, which was about how much money certain Wal Street investors spent on a local dominatrix. It was actually financially concerned journalism.
Originally posted by beezzer
Shouldn't this be a decision best made in the home instead of a de facto decision made by government?
Originally posted by stormcell
Originally posted by beezzer
Shouldn't this be a decision best made in the home instead of a de facto decision made by government?
They did try context sensitive porn filters - block sites based on keywords and pictures; but they ended up blocking bird-watching sites, basketball and other sports. That's the main problem. It's easy to define the extreme stuff, but then things like department store catalogs can get included as well.
Originally posted by beezzer
Shouldn't this be a decision best made in the home instead of a de facto decision made by government?
Originally posted by Biigs
Originally posted by christafinias
soooo, will they start block stuff on TV, like Spartacus and True blood? hope not!
I think if children have access to the internet, then its the parents responsibility to monitor that.
If parents don't know how to use computers, smartphones or parental controls and filters then they should learn.
get smart, learn this stuff or not have the internet in.
just my opinion anyway
They even THINK about touching my game of thrones, im gunna have to get all serious.
Porn is one thing, but leave my sexy awesome dramas alone!
Originally posted by beezzer
Shouldn't this be a decision best made in the home instead of a de facto decision made by government?