It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
This wont get through parliament, MP's are the dirtiest of dirt bags when it comes to porn
We feel massively threatened by it, its a danger danger to us. The majority citizen, women are over half the population from 20 years of age on, feels incredibly threatened by it and demeaned and feels sorry for the victims, most want it gone, but its shoved in our faces, to keep women down and abused and objects, and put them in their place....!!!
Originally posted by Blahable
Good for them!
Way too accessible for young people.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
Look, without linking and posting examples...there is PLENTY of normal, straight porn with realistic looking people. There is a HUGE market for "amateur" pornography. People are tired of silicone and bad acting.
Hiding your head in the sand by blocking porn won't solve any problems. [color=gold] How about raise kids that don't want to watch, or care for porn in the first place?
Wow, what a concept.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Swizzy
The ONLY women who don't see this, are a few men pleasers, as some do when they're younger, and the victims.
So, sorry.
Originally posted by Blahable
Good for them!
Way too accessible for young people.
Originally posted by andy06shake
Pornography is not for young people or children. Point is if they are accessing said material then there parents are at fault.
If you don't want your kids looking at porn simply engage the parental controls. [color=gold] No point ruining it for everyone else! LoL
Originally posted by MrWendal
I have another point to add to this discussion that people should really consider......
If the Government, with the stroke of a pen, can block your access to porn. How long do you think it will be before they decide to block alternative news sites, conspiracy sites, or anything else the deem unfit?
The truth is, a move like this sets a precedence to block by default anything they want.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
reply to post by mikegrouchy
Well, you can shelter them from porn, tell them/brainwash them into believing it's evil and that they'll go to hell forever if they have sex outside of procreation.
Lots of people raised in strict religious homes despise any kind of porn, and wouldn't ever be caught dead looking or searching for it. It's all about indoctrinating your children at a very early age to adopt a set of morals that you want them to have.
Kids are like sponges, if you want to mold them into believing and saving their "virginity" as you put it -- just program them that way. It's like training a dog to sit and roll over.
Personally, I would want my child to think for itself...but then I'm not big on scaring people into behaving a certain way via religious teachings.
Originally posted by alysha.angel
As a parent of teenage girls , i strongly approve of this and believe its needed ..
Iv heard of young men and women being currupted and sexually twisted due to porn and its not really a need,
i hope someday the rest of the world does the same thing . its degrading to the actors and its not much better then prostiution
www.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
And this approach goes a long way to preventing the introduction of more draconian laws.