It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Writing for the Court in Florida v. Royer 460 U.S. 491 (1983), Justice White stated,
The person approached, however, need not answer any question put to him; indeed, he may decline to listen to the questions at all and may go on his way. — 460 U.S. at 497–498
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by spartacus699
I'm not a country...I was born free...Thanks..
Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot
But there was no issue here. They were outside of the office and jail filming. The officers had every right to ask for identification.
When he failed to comply, their first response should have been to ask them to remove themselves from the premises. Failure to comply can result in escalation.
An officer asking to see identification is not violation of the 4th amendment. It is not a search or seizure. In this case, the officers were violating nothing.
But there was no issue here. They were outside of the office and jail filming. The officers had every right to ask for identification.