I appreciate the more stringent guidelines. They will ultimately increase the demand for someone to actually read the article before posting. If ATSNN
is on some major search engines, then we definitely need to have a uniform method of posting news. Otherwise, our external credibility decreases. I
think it is a good move from the standpoint of focused behavior change.
"What do you think of...."
"YOU NEED TO SEE THIS!"
"What would happen if..."
"Is this for real?"
Etc..etc..
Psycho-socially, these topics increase readers' curiosity, and that is why they keep repeating themselves in the "RECENT THREADS" section. It's
really starting to bug me, because it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that this is how spamming works.
I agree. Also the titles that Dot quoted are misleading because their phrasing seduces you into clicking on them. I'm sure we all appreciate the
quest for knowledge but also theory, and I occasionally appreciate the content of these more theoretical posts. However often I find that the post
titles are so broad and general that the post turns into controlled chaos. This is disappointing from a theoretical standpoint because it jades the
hypotheses that are generated.
They should at least include a SUBJECT in their title.
"Is
this for real?"
This?? ATS? The Universe? Taco Hell? Your existence? Give us some direction please, Camus!
MK