Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by N1thNa1ath
Well guys the thing is that it really works...i´ve got people round there and they measured a scale model showing the quantity of energy in can get
by transforming it into son kind of dynamo...
i guess it is based on this
Number 1: Scale models are not sufficient.
Number 2: Youtube is not evidence of anything beyond gullibility. (There is a proper way to support a claim, youtube is not it)
Number 3: Sorry we can't take your word on it.
Can't/won't take your word that it won't work either.
They are building the engines, they have national and international news coverage, there's a LOT of money and effort being spent after examining a
proof of concept scale version the results and performance of which, according to reports and the fact that the full scale engine is being built, has
convinced the builders to create the two real world sized versions we see taking shape in this thread and elsewhere.
Number 1: Scale models are not sufficient.
That's going to disappoint just about every engineering organisation in existence then.
Want to reconsider that statement?
Earthquake resistant building designs are tested and evaluated using small scale models on vibrating or swaying platforms to simulate the forces of an
earthquake and the data gathered has been used to engineer real world skyscrapers with earthquake dampener and shock absorbers...aircraft designers
have used scale models of their craft since the industry began, and used the results gained very successfully to build real world aircraft used
everyday around the world...in fact just about every early engineering project starts off with a proof of concept engineering scale model or
models...are all these 'insufficient' examples of using scale models to test a concept in your mind too?
Leonardo Da Vinci, an engineering genius, was big on scale models too.
I might remind you, that the force of gravity is measured as 1G...this force of 1G acts on everything...from a grain of sand to a skyscraper...1G
would be the same acting on a scale model the size of a fridge as it would be on a real world, room sized engine.
Before going of on yet another frankly tedious and repetitive anti-alternative-energy-engineering tirade against any and all who have even so much as
a passing interest in such engineering..this time at least, wait and see what comes of it before consigning it to the hoax or fraud section of your
mind..that area of your brain must be pretty crowded with the amount of negativity that goes on inside it.
As long as there are Human beings, there will be fraudsters, but similarly as long as there are Human beings, there will be ground breaking and
astounding works of engineering.
Besides, don't worry...i don't hear anyone is asking you personally for your money...so you can relax if your angle for consistently snubbing these
subjects is a fear you're going to be 'diddled out of money'.
If it does work, and many of us are hopeful that it will, you and your equally negative buddies don't have to make use of it at all - you can pay
full whack to the rip off energy corps for the rest of your days if that's what floats your boat...in fact, if i had my way, i'd insist you and
others like you who continually rubbish these ideas and devices arbitrarily, don't have access to any of the benefits of a successful engine.
I don't know if this engine will deliver on the engineers claims, you don't know either...but it's one thing to doubt that something will work, and
quite another to go around pretending and trying to convince others that you do know it won't. It is basically a lie, besides being predictably
defeatist and uninteresting.
The world NEEDS alternatively minded engineers to experiment on these kinds of technologies, that's true from any point of view or side of the fence
you're coming from, whether it's ecological, financial, political or ideological.
The ONLY area where this wouldn't be welcome is by those already financially invested or interested in maintaining the current energy monopolies.
Which makes it strange that on threads such as this, it always appears to be you and a few other members that seem to be on these threads like flies
around the proverbial turd every time one pops up, although you and they don't seem to realise that your posts and posts like yours, are essentially
carrots to those who are experimenting in this field of research..it's reverse psychology.
The more people like you try to steer people away from this research, the more they will try to prove you wrong..maybe not by the first or even the
1000th design or combination, but one day they will.
If we can imagine it, we can find ways to engineer it, despite and often in spite of concerted dissention. It's always been the case, and probably
always will be.