It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The environment itself isn't conscious, and it makes no determination concerning what sort of change/event occurrence is happening.
Something from nothing? Who said that?
however, i think this is a terrible metaphor.)
Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by ImaFungi
oooohhhhhh.... the plot thickens. great questions.
btw, i thought your last post about the "entanglement believers" was a bit of a red herring. the phenomenon is far better established than you are letting on.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by PhotonEffect
Tell me why what im about to say is impossible.
a particle that is entangled with another has 2 possible states. State 1 or state 2.
We have a device that makes entangled particles. Boom. 2 particles are made.
Believers in entanglement would claim that both particles onto themselves are each in state 1 and state 2 at the same time. They would say when a measurement occurs on (one of the particles) the first particle, it is seen that the particle is an exact state, (lets say for example when this measurement occurs it is in state) 1.
Then the other particle, is destined to be 2 when measured.
Why could it not be that. When the entangled particles are created. one of the particles is state 1. The other particle is state 2. And when the first is measured, it is seen to be state 1. That means the second is destined to be 2. because it was 2.
Originally posted by tgidkp
so now i will throw you a fish: care to explain how each and every little one-at-a-time photon "knows" how to generate the interference pattern in the double-slit experiment?
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by NorEaster
The environment itself isn't conscious, and it makes no determination concerning what sort of change/event occurrence is happening.
Something from nothing? Who said that?
Given the environment is conscious then a basis for interaction would be apparent.
Consciousness exist not because of something coming from nothing but rather. That we are conscious because we exist in a conscious environment. The tendency of life towards existing in this environment is inherent, being an aspect or image of a living thing, its origin. Depending upon the development of said organisms. Some and then eventually all will comes to terms with this and that is transcendence. One context being in the works of Carl Jung and the Collective Unconscious.
Feel free to know that I am enjoying this conversation. But also understand that based upon my experiences above is apparent.
I can't help the fact you have never spent two years as I have
Originally posted by ImaFungi
First of all there is a difference between the double slit; Shooting exactly 1 photon, and bringing superposition into the mix by saying the photon goes through both slits, or that it only goes through one slit for sure, but since we dont know what slit it goes through when we are not observing (obviously, I dont know how many fingers you are holding behind the back when im not observing them), when we do observe there is no interference pattern, because the detector used for observation, is the 'observer' that 'collapses' the wave function and forces the photon to go in an exact slit. I dont know exactly why this occurs, but all the explanations ive heard are related to the fact that any of our means of detection requires as reflecting light off an object, and then receiving that light and interpreting it (radar,sonar,x rays, cameras,microscopes). So when we do this to try and observe the photon, this detector interacts with the environment in some manner, that causes the single photon (remember this is only single photon experiment, not one after the other, just what happens with 1 photon) to go through 1 slit. like the entanglement scenario, I would assume that whether we detect or not the single photon travels through one slit.
Did you know that DNA has room temp superconductive properties and can enter a resonant state possibly similar to what you're describing...