It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by qmantoo
The same evidence is used by scentists when they are examining craters, rilles and every other geological feature they say is on the Moon or on any other planetry body. They only have poor photographic evidence and in the past, not much of that either.
It is easy to say everything is a rock or artifact or lighting effect, but what is more difficult is to own up the the reality that there are aliens on the Moon. NASA knows it, we know it, now is the time to come clean and stop all this messing about wasting all this money.
I will only add my vote to the guys up here that say it could be anything.
I don't see anything out of the ordinary on these pictures. That is, on the pictures we are allowed to see. Id say that people who try to find signs of alien activity on the moon are making a huge logical error. If NASA was so deliberate on squelching all possible signs of contact out of their transmissions and recordings, what makes you think they allowed such revelations to be seen on a publicly available images? My take is, if there was anything seen on the Moon it definitely DID NOT MAKE IT to the general public.
I couldn't agree more. They've known about what is really on the moon since the 1920s. There IS an atmosphere, albeit very thin, that extends for approx. 3 miles and there is water ice at the poles. I suspect that there is also plenty of water underground as well.