posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 04:28 AM
Originally posted by the sloth
reply to post by Kharron
I agree that Rolling Stone has the right to print whatever they want under the First Amendment. If they're prepared to deal with the consequences,
more power to em I say. However, what in blazes could they possibly be writing about when the suspect in question hasn't even given his side of the
story to anyone? Did they get a secret interview with the kid somehow. Doubtful, but worth looking into.
I believe they interviewed friends, teachers, etc. to get some kind of awareness of who he was as a person. My only beef is that they kind of set him
up to be sort of a bad-boy rock star type. Apparently they talk about girls being crazy about him....
What the heck does that have to do with