It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
Yeah, that's right, the chick that was going for the book deal does not speak for the rest of the jury. So stop with the chest thumping. These women had a difficult time with their job. In the end, reasonable doubt won the day.
I think I was pretty clear. You and all your like-minded friends were all over the Zimmerman thread with how there was no evidence. It was a "slam dunk".
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by Domo1
I never EVER said that. You need to check yourself and the OP. I SAID that the individuals that were stating what a slam dunk, "no case" bull puckey need to realize that there were issues that were taken up by this jury.
And they did that, carefully. They don't agree with your assessment of "slam dunk". So rest it.
edit on 18-7-2013 by GrantedBail because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by Ameilia
Well because this woman made that statement that she felt that Zimmerman absolutely was in fear of his life. That is why.
Apparently the other jurors don't agree.
I am not sure it is ethical to have jurors going onto the television anyway. Judges perhaps but jurors no.
Originally posted by iwilliam